Wu Song, Cai Wei, Zhang Yanjun, Liu Ying, Jin Shenghua
College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Research Centre of Brain Function and Psychological Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China; Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Psychol Rep. 2018 Apr;121(2):253-264. doi: 10.1177/0033294117726288. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Several psychologists have paid attention to individual differences in deception detection, but only a few studies have found significant results. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between attachment anxiety and deception judgment when there are no obvious cues to distinguish lies from truth, and to examine the moderating effect of motives. Participants were instructed to judge each of 10 audios on whether they were true or false. Subsequently, the attachment anxiety of participants was assessed using the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire. Results revealed that, compared with people who had low attachment anxiety, those with high attachment anxiety tend to have higher truth biases in the low-motive condition and lower accuracy in the high-motive condition.
几位心理学家关注了在欺骗检测方面的个体差异，但只有少数研究取得了显著成果。本研究旨在探讨在没有明显线索区分谎言与真相的情况下，依恋焦虑与欺骗判断之间的关系，并检验动机的调节作用。参与者被要求判断10段音频中的每一段是真是假。随后，使用亲密关系经历问卷评估参与者的依恋焦虑。结果显示，与依恋焦虑程度低的人相比，依恋焦虑程度高的人在低动机条件下往往有更高的真相偏向，在高动机条件下准确性更低。
