Suppr超能文献

乙酰甲胆碱激发试验:振动网式雾化器与射流雾化器产生的气道反应性比较。

Methacholine Challenge: Comparison of Airway Responsiveness Produced by a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer Versus a Jet Nebulizer.

机构信息

1 Department of Physiology, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada .

2 Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada .

出版信息

J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2018 Apr;31(2):88-93. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2017.1392. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The latest methacholine challenge testing (MCT) guidelines published by the European Respiratory Society recommend the characterization of nebulizers before their use in clinics and research. Such investigations are necessary for accurately determining the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV (PD) delivered by a given device. The standard English Wright (Wright) jet nebulizer recommended in the 1999 guidelines by the American Thoracic Society has become difficult to obtain and possesses some characteristics that complicate the calculation of dose delivery from this device (e.g. evaporation). Our objective was to determine if the Aerogen Solo (Solo) vibrating mesh nebulizer provides similar methacholine challenge test results compared to the currently used Wright jet nebulizer.

METHODS

Sixty mild-to-moderate asthmatics were studied across three research sites in a randomized crossover study. Both methacholine challenges were completed at least 24 hours apart within a 2-week period. Testing with the Wright device was performed as per the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol. The Solo study arm followed the same procedure except for a shorter inhalation time of 1 minute. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV (PC) and the methacholine PD were calculated following each methacholine challenge.

RESULTS

The geometric mean methacholine PC values for the Solo and the Wright differed statistically (0.65 mg/mL vs. 2.58 mg/mL, respectively, p < 0.00001) and clinically. Between-nebulizer geometric mean methacholine PD results are comparable by clinical standards [81.7 μg (Solo) vs. 64.7 μg (Wright)], although the slight difference in dose was statistically significant (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparability of PD values between the Solo and the Wright validates the importance of reporting airway responsiveness to methacholine in terms of dose and not concentration, as stressed in the latest testing guidelines. This finding along with several benefits associated with the Solo make it a promising nebulizer for performing MCT.

摘要

背景

欧洲呼吸学会发布的最新乙酰甲胆碱挑战测试(MCT)指南建议在将雾化器用于临床和研究之前对其进行特征描述。这些研究对于准确确定给定设备输送的导致 FEV1 下降 20%的乙酰甲胆碱激发剂量(PD)是必要的。美国胸科学会 1999 年指南中推荐的标准英文 Wright(赖特)射流雾化器已难以获得,并且具有一些使该设备的剂量输送计算复杂化的特征(例如蒸发)。我们的目标是确定 Aerogen Solo(Solo)振动网孔雾化器是否与当前使用的 Wright 射流雾化器提供相似的乙酰甲胆碱挑战测试结果。

方法

在一项三中心随机交叉研究中,对 60 名轻中度哮喘患者进行了研究。两次乙酰甲胆碱挑战之间至少间隔 24 小时,在 2 周内完成。使用 Wright 设备进行测试时,按照 2 分钟潮式呼吸方案进行。 Solo 研究组采用相同的程序,但吸入时间更短,为 1 分钟。每次乙酰甲胆碱挑战后,计算引起 FEV1 下降 20%的乙酰甲胆碱 PC 浓度(PC)和乙酰甲胆碱 PD。

结果

Solo 和 Wright 的几何平均乙酰甲胆碱 PC 值在统计学上和临床上均存在差异(分别为 0.65mg/mL 和 2.58mg/mL,p<0.00001)。按照临床标准,雾化器之间的几何平均乙酰甲胆碱 PD 结果具有可比性[81.7μg(Solo)与 64.7μg(Wright)],尽管剂量略有差异,但在统计学上有显著意义(p=0.018)。

结论

Solo 和 Wright 的 PD 值具有可比性,这验证了最新测试指南中强调的重要性,即在报告乙酰甲胆碱气道反应性时要根据剂量而不是浓度来报告,这一发现以及 Solo 相关的几个优点使其成为进行 MCT 的有前途的雾化器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验