Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, ICT Centre, Birmingham, UK.
Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul;44(7):504-508. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104299. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Advances in medical capability should be accompanied by discussion of their ethical implications. In the military medical context there is a growing interest in developing prophylactic interventions that will mitigate the effects of trauma and improve survival. The ethics of this novel capability are currently unexplored. This paper describes the concept of trauma prophylaxis (Left Of Bang Interventions in Trauma) and outlines some of the ethical issues that need to be considered, including within concept development, research and implementation. Trauma prophylaxis can be divided into interventions that do not (type 1) and those that do (type 2) have medical enhancement as an unintended side effect of their prophylactic action. We conclude that type 1 interventions have much in common with established military medical prophylaxis, and the potentially enhancing qualities of type 2 interventions raise different issues. We welcome further debate on both interventions.
医学能力的进步应该伴随着对其伦理影响的讨论。在军事医学背景下,人们越来越感兴趣的是开发预防干预措施,以减轻创伤的影响并提高存活率。这种新能力的伦理问题目前尚未得到探讨。本文描述了创伤预防(创伤前的干预)的概念,并概述了一些需要考虑的伦理问题,包括概念开发、研究和实施。创伤预防可以分为没有(1 型)和有(2 型)医疗增强作为其预防作用的意外副作用的干预措施。我们的结论是,1 型干预措施与既定的军事医疗预防措施有很多共同之处,而 2 型干预措施的潜在增强性质则带来了不同的问题。我们欢迎就这两种干预措施进行进一步的辩论。