• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾周围脓肿早期阑尾切除术的安全可行时间限制

Safe and Feasible Time Limit for Early Appendectomy in Appendiceal Mass.

作者信息

Pandit R K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Janaki Medical College, Janakpur, Nepal.

出版信息

Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):210-214.

PMID:28814680
Abstract

Background Early appendectomy in appendiceal mass is gaining popularity among some surgeons. However, it is endowed with increasing operative difficulty with time, and safe and feasible timing is not yet clear. Objective To know safe and feasible time limit for early appendectomy in appendiceal mass. Method This is a retrospective study. Between May 2009 and July 2014, 114 patients of appendiceal mass who underwent early surgical intervention by a single surgeon were studied. Group I included 98 patients operated within seven days of onset of pain and group II included 16 patients operated between 8th and 15 days of pain. Type of operative procedure, difficulties and complications were analyzed. Result There were 58 men and 56 women. Their mean age was 24.27 ± 8.7 years. In group I, 98 (100%) patients had appendectomy and adhesiolysis was safe and feasible. In group II, 5(31.25%) patients had extra-peritoneal drainage of abscess without attempt for appendectomy. Remaining 11 patients had attempt for appendectomy, but only 3(18.75%) out of 4 patients operated on the 8th day could have appendectomy. Six (37.5%) patients had just drainage of abscess. Two (12.5%) patients, operated on the 12th and 15th days of pain had just open-closed due to dense adhesion and both resolved. One patient operated on the 10th day sustained ileal injury. Surgical site infection occurred in 16.6% (14 in 86) in group I and 33.3% (5 in 15) in group B (P= 0.001). Mean operative time was 34.4 ± 9.23 minutes and 43.7 ± 16.38 minutes for group I and group II respectively. Mean hospital stay after surgery was 2.9 ± 1.1 days and 5.5 ± 1.37 days in group I and group II respectively. Conclusion Early appendectomy in appendiceal mass seems safe and feasible up to 7th day since onset of pain in my experience. However, this limit may vary with surgeon's experience, and further studies are required to better clarify this issue.

摘要

背景

阑尾肿块早期行阑尾切除术在一些外科医生中越来越受欢迎。然而,随着时间推移,其手术难度不断增加,安全可行的手术时机尚不明确。目的:了解阑尾肿块早期阑尾切除术的安全可行时限。方法:这是一项回顾性研究。2009年5月至2014年7月,对114例由单一外科医生进行早期手术干预的阑尾肿块患者进行研究。第一组包括98例在疼痛发作7天内接受手术的患者,第二组包括16例在疼痛发作第8天至第15天接受手术的患者。分析手术方式、难度及并发症。结果:男性58例,女性56例。平均年龄24.27±8.7岁。第一组中,98例(100%)患者行阑尾切除术,粘连松解安全可行。第二组中,5例(31.25%)患者行脓肿腹膜外引流,未尝试行阑尾切除术。其余11例患者尝试行阑尾切除术,但在疼痛发作第8天手术的4例患者中,仅3例(18.75%)成功切除阑尾。6例(37.5%)患者仅行脓肿引流。2例(12.5%)在疼痛发作第12天和第15天接受手术的患者因粘连致密仅行开放闭合术,均康复。1例在疼痛发作第10天接受手术的患者发生回肠损伤。第一组手术部位感染发生率为16.6%(86例中有14例),第二组为33.3%(15例中有5例)(P = 0.001)。第一组和第二组的平均手术时间分别为34.4±9.23分钟和43.7±16.38分钟。第一组和第二组术后平均住院时间分别为2.9±1.1天和5.5±1.37天。结论:根据我的经验,阑尾肿块在疼痛发作后7天内行早期阑尾切除术似乎是安全可行的。然而,这一时限可能因外科医生的经验而异,需要进一步研究以更好地阐明这一问题。

相似文献

1
Safe and Feasible Time Limit for Early Appendectomy in Appendiceal Mass.阑尾周围脓肿早期阑尾切除术的安全可行时间限制
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):210-214.
2
Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study.对于伴有阑尾包块的急性阑尾炎患儿,早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jul;40(7):1134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.046.
3
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的前瞻性对比研究
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016;14(55):244-248.
4
Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
Outcomes of interval appendectomy in comparison with appendectomy for acute appendicitis.间隔期阑尾切除术与急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的疗效比较。
J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
7
Appendectomy Skin Closure Technique, Randomized Controlled Trial: Changing Paradigms (ASC).阑尾切除术皮肤缝合技术,随机对照试验:改变模式(ASC)
World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3607-x.
8
Laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: is it safe and justified?: A retrospective analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎:是否安全且合理?一项回顾性分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Jun;21(3):142-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31821ad770.
9
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
10
Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children.儿童分期腹腔镜阑尾切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Jun;16(3):308-11. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.308.