Wang Xiaolin, Zhang Wen, Yang Xiaojin, Shao Jinfan, Zhou Xuefeng, Yuan Jiyan
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tong ji Hospital, Tong ji Medical College, Hua zhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, PR China.
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
Good outcomes have been reported with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for uncomplicated appendicitis in children, but the use of laparoscopy for complicated appendicitis in children is more controversial. This is related to a higher incidence of postoperative abdominal and wound infections. The purpose of this trial was to retrospectively compare LA and open appendectomy (OA) for complicated appendicitis and evaluate the efficacy of LA in children with complicated appendicitis.
The outcome of 128 patients with complicated appendicitis in children was retrospectively analyzed. There were 80 children in the LA group and 48 in the OA group. The appendectomies were performed by a single senior surgeon and his surgical trainees. There was no selection of cases for LA. Data collection included demographics, operative time, resumption of diet, infectious complications (wound infection and intraabdominal abscess), length of hospitalization, and duration of antibiotic use.
There were no cases of LA that required conversion to OA. The operative time for LA (88.5 +/- 28.8 minutes for LA vs 71.8 +/- 30.6 minutes for OA; t = 3.10; P = .002) was longer. Patients in the LA group returned to oral intake earlier (1.8 +/- 0.6 days for LA vs 2.8 +/- 0.8 days for OA; t = -8.04; P < .01) and had a shorter length of hospital stay (6.5 +/- 2.2 days for LA vs 7.8 +/- 2.9 days for OA; t = -2.87; P = .005). The incidence of wound infection (1/80 [1.3%] for LA vs 6/48 [12.5%] for OA; P < .05) and postoperative intraabdominal abscess (2/80 [2.5%] for LA vs 7/48 [14.6%] for OA; P < .05) in LA group was lower. No significant difference was found in the duration of antibiotic administration between the 2 groups (5.8 +/- 1.8 days for LA vs 6.3 +/- 2.3 days for OA; t = -1.37; P = .174). No mortality was observed in either group.
The minimally invasive laparoscopic technique is feasible, safe, and efficacious for children with complicated appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy should be the initial procedure of choice for most cases of complicated appendicitis in children.
已有报道称,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗儿童单纯性阑尾炎效果良好,但腹腔镜技术用于儿童复杂性阑尾炎的治疗仍存在较多争议。这与术后腹部感染和伤口感染的发生率较高有关。本试验的目的是回顾性比较LA和开腹阑尾切除术(OA)治疗复杂性阑尾炎的效果,并评估LA治疗儿童复杂性阑尾炎的疗效。
回顾性分析128例儿童复杂性阑尾炎患者的治疗结果。LA组80例,OA组48例。阑尾切除术由一位资深外科医生及其手术学员完成。LA未进行病例筛选。数据收集包括人口统计学资料、手术时间、饮食恢复情况、感染性并发症(伤口感染和腹腔内脓肿)、住院时间和抗生素使用时间。
LA组无一例需要转为OA手术。LA组的手术时间较长(LA组为88.5±28.8分钟,OA组为71.8±30.6分钟;t = 3.10;P = .002)。LA组患者更早恢复经口进食(LA组为1.8±0.6天,OA组为2.8±0.8天;t = -8.04;P < .01),住院时间更短(LA组为6.5±2.2天,OA组为7.8±2.9天;t = -2.87;P = .005)。LA组的伤口感染发生率(LA组为1/80 [1.3%],OA组为6/48 [12.5%];P < .05)和术后腹腔内脓肿发生率(LA组为2/80 [2.5%],OA组为7/48 [14.6%];P < .05)更低。两组之间抗生素使用时间无显著差异(LA组为5.8±1.8天,OA组为6.3±2.3天;t = -1.37;P = .174)。两组均未观察到死亡病例。
微创腹腔镜技术治疗儿童复杂性阑尾炎是可行、安全且有效的。对于大多数儿童复杂性阑尾炎病例,腹腔镜阑尾切除术应作为首选的初始手术方式。