• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病终末期的预后变量和评分:一项系统评价

Prognostic variables and scores identifying the end of life in COPD: a systematic review.

作者信息

Smith Laura-Jane E, Moore Elizabeth, Ali Ifrah, Smeeth Liam, Stone Patrick, Quint Jennifer K

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, Imperial College London.

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 31;12:2239-2256. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S137868. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S137868
PMID:28814852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5546187/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

COPD is a major cause of mortality, and the unpredictable trajectory of the disease can bring challenges to end-of-life care. We aimed to investigate known prognostic variables and scores that predict prognosis in COPD in a systematic literature review, specifically including variables that contribute to risk assessment of patients for death within 12 months.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review on prognostic variables, multivariate score or models for COPD. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane database, Cochrane CENTRAL, DARE and CINAHL were searched up to May 1, 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 5,276 abstracts were screened, leading to 516 full-text reviews, and 10 met the inclusion criteria. No multivariable indices were developed with the specific aim of predicting all-cause mortality in stable COPD within 12 months. Only nine indices were identified from four studies, which had been validated for this time period. Tools developed using expert knowledge were also identified, including the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance, the RADboud Indicators of Palliative Care Needs, the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and the Necesidades Paliativas program tool.

CONCLUSION

A number of variables contributing to the prediction of all-cause mortality in COPD were identified. However, there are very few studies that are designed to assess, or report, the prediction of mortality at or less than 12 months. The quality of evidence remains low, such that no single variable or multivariable score can currently be recommended.

摘要

引言

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是主要的死亡原因,该疾病不可预测的病程会给临终关怀带来挑战。我们旨在通过系统的文献综述,研究已知的预测COPD预后的变量和评分,特别包括有助于评估患者在12个月内死亡风险的变量。

方法

我们对COPD的预后变量、多变量评分或模型进行了系统综述。截至2016年5月1日,检索了Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane数据库、Cochrane CENTRAL、DARE和CINAHL。

结果

共筛选了5276篇摘要,得到516篇全文综述,其中10篇符合纳入标准。没有专门为预测稳定期COPD患者12个月内全因死亡率而开发的多变量指标。从四项研究中仅确定了九个指标,这些指标在该时间段内已经过验证。还确定了使用专家知识开发的工具,包括金标准框架预后指标指南、拉德堡姑息治疗需求指标、支持性和姑息治疗指标工具以及姑息治疗需求计划工具。

结论

确定了一些有助于预测COPD全因死亡率的变量。然而,很少有研究旨在评估或报告12个月及以内的死亡率预测情况。证据质量仍然较低,因此目前无法推荐单一变量或多变量评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1733/5546187/bc89aa317739/copd-12-2239Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1733/5546187/bc89aa317739/copd-12-2239Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1733/5546187/bc89aa317739/copd-12-2239Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic variables and scores identifying the end of life in COPD: a systematic review.识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病终末期的预后变量和评分:一项系统评价
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jul 31;12:2239-2256. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S137868. eCollection 2017.
2
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
3
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施(包括针对病情加重的行动计划)与常规护理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD011682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011682.pub2.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).干预措施以提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)药物治疗的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):CD013381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013381.pub2.
7
Prophylactic antibiotics for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者的预防性抗生素治疗:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD013198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013198.pub2.
8
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
9
Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Elderly Patients: Therapeutic Opportunity or Medical Futility? An Updated Narrative Review.无创通气在老年患者中的作用:治疗契机还是医疗无用功?一篇更新的叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 17;61(7):1288. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071288.
2
Leveraging Subjective Parameters and Biomarkers in Machine Learning Models: The Feasibility of for Managing Emphysema Progression.在机器学习模型中利用主观参数和生物标志物:管理肺气肿进展的可行性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 3;15(9):1165. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15091165.
3
Focus on the Role of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support (NRS) during Palliative Care in Patients with Life-Limiting Respiratory Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic variables and scores identifying the last year of life in COPD: a systematic review protocol.识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生命最后一年的预后变量和评分:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e011677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011677.
2
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review.普通人群心血管疾病风险预测模型:系统评价
BMJ. 2016 May 16;353:i2416. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2416.
3
Prognostic assessment in COPD without lung function: the B-AE-D indices.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)无肺功能情况下的预后评估:B-AE-D指数
关注无创呼吸支持(NRS)在终末期呼吸疾病患者姑息治疗中的作用。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):5165. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175165.
4
The PROgnostic ModEl for chronic lung disease (PRO-MEL): development and temporal validation.慢性肺病预后模型(PRO-MEL):建立和时间验证。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03233-0.
5
Prognostic models and factors identifying end-of-life in non-cancer chronic diseases: a systematic review.非癌症慢性疾病中识别临终状态的预后模型及因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2316-e2329. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004656.
6
Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.印度重症医学学会和印度姑息治疗协会关于重症监护病房临终关怀与姑息治疗的专家共识及立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar;28(3):200-250. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24661.
7
Non-invasive ventilation in the care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with palliative care needs: a scoping review.对有姑息治疗需求的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行非侵入性通气护理:范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 29;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01365-y.
8
Prognostic Value of Pace Variability, a Novel 6MWT-Derived Feature, in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.6MWT 衍生新特征——变时性对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的预后价值
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Jul 21;18:1555-1564. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S407708. eCollection 2023.
9
Patterns of Communication About Serious Illness in the Years, Months, and Days before Death.死亡前数年、数月及数天内关于严重疾病的沟通模式。
Palliat Med Rep. 2022 Aug 4;3(1):116-122. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2022.0024. eCollection 2022.
10
Predicting mortality in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA): development of a four-year index and comparison with international measures.预测爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)中的死亡率:四年指数的制定及与国际指标的比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03196-z.
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jun;47(6):1635-44. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01485-2015. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
Phase 2 Randomised Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of Future Care Planning in Patients with Advanced Heart Disease.晚期心脏病患者未来护理规划的2期随机对照试验及可行性研究
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 19;6:24619. doi: 10.1038/srep24619.
5
Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.低事件数低维数据中风险预测的惩罚回归方法综述与评估
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 30;35(7):1159-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.6782. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Prognostic value of multidimensional indices in ambulatory COPD patients.动态慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者多维指标的预后价值
Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Oct;26(8):e38-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
Prognostic scores in heart failure - Critical appraisal and practical use.心力衰竭的预后评分——批判性评估与实际应用
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jun 1;188:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.154. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
8
Differential Effect of Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea, COPD Assessment Test, and Clinical COPD Questionnaire for Symptoms Evaluation Within the New GOLD Staging and Mortality in COPD.改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表、慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试及临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷在慢性阻塞性肺疾病新全球倡议分期及死亡率中对症状评估的差异效应
Chest. 2015 Jul;148(1):159-168. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2449.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.预测模型研究系统评价的严格评价与数据提取:CHARM 清单
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 14;11(10):e1001744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744. eCollection 2014 Oct.