• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可调节迷你吊带与传统中尿道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Rudnicki Martin, von Bothmer-Ostling Katarina, Holstad Anja, Magnusson Claes, Majida Memona, Merkel Constanze, Prien Jens, Jakobsson Ulf, Teleman Pia

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Halmstad Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13205
PMID:28815547
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was to compare the objective and subjective outcomes and short-term complication rates of an adjustable single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) vs. standard mid-urethral slings (SMUS). The secondary aim was to report pain perception and complications at the one-year follow up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized trial where women were included from eight centers in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01754558. A total of 305 women less than 60 years old with verified stress urinary incontinence were included. All women were randomized to SIMS (Ajust ; n = 155) or SMUS (TVT, TVT-O or TOT; n = 150) and were evaluated by stress test and bladder diary before and after surgery and symptoms related to incontinence using ICIQ-SF, PISQ-12 and PGI-S and PGI-I. Objective cure was defined as no leakage during a stress test and subjective cure defined as no leakage stated in the bladder diary or no indication of urinary leakage in the ICIQ-SF. Furthermore, mesh exposure and dyspareunia were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 280 women [141 (91%) in the SIMS and 139 (94%) in the SMUS groups] participated in the one-year follow up. No difference between the groups was observed regarding objective and subjective outcomes. VAS score disclosed a lower postoperative pain perception in the SIMS group than in the SMUS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ajust appears to be as efficient as SMUS regarding objective and subjective outcomes and was associated with less pain perception during the postoperative period.

摘要

引言

本研究的主要目的是比较可调节单切口迷你吊带(SIMS)与标准中尿道吊带(SMUS)的客观和主观结果以及短期并发症发生率。次要目的是报告一年随访时的疼痛感知和并发症情况。

材料与方法

本研究设计为一项多中心前瞻性随机试验,纳入了来自丹麦、挪威和瑞典八个中心的女性。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册:NCT01754558。共纳入305名年龄小于60岁且确诊为压力性尿失禁的女性。所有女性被随机分为SIMS组(Ajust;n = 155)或SMUS组(TVT、TVT - O或TOT;n = 150),并在手术前后通过压力测试和膀胱日记进行评估,同时使用ICIQ - SF、PISQ - 12以及PGI - S和PGI - I评估与尿失禁相关的症状。客观治愈定义为压力测试时无漏尿,主观治愈定义为膀胱日记中无漏尿记录或ICIQ - SF中无尿漏迹象。此外,记录网片暴露和性交困难情况。

结果

共有280名女性[SIMS组141名(91%),SMUS组139名(94%)]参与了一年随访。两组在客观和主观结果方面未观察到差异。视觉模拟评分(VAS)显示,SIMS组术后疼痛感知低于SMUS组。

结论

在客观和主观结果方面,Ajust似乎与SMUS一样有效,且术后疼痛感知较少。

相似文献

1
Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial.可调节迷你吊带与传统中尿道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.可调节微型吊带与传统中尿道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验的3年随访
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1465-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04004-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
4
A multicentre prospective randomised study of single-incision mini-sling (Ajust®) versus tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O™) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: pain profile and short-term outcomes.一项多中心前瞻性随机研究,比较单切口迷你吊带(Ajust®)与经阴道无张力吊带-闭孔器(TVT-O™)在女性压力性尿失禁治疗中的应用:疼痛特征和短期结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;165(1):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
5
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
6
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up.单切口迷你吊带(Ajust)与标准经闭孔尿道中段吊带(Align)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:1年随访
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):726-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.007.
9
Multicenter prospective randomized study of single-incision mini-sling vs tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in management of female stress urinary incontinence: a minimum of 1-year follow-up.单切口迷你吊带与经阴道无张力吊带-闭孔器治疗女性压力性尿失禁的多中心前瞻性随机研究:至少 1 年随访。
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.080. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
Comparison of an adjustable anchored single-incision mini-sling, Ajust(®) , with a standard mid-urethral sling, TVT-O(TM) : a health economic evaluation.可调节锚定单切口迷你吊带(Ajust(®))与标准经尿道中段吊带(TVT-O(TM))的比较:一项健康经济学评价。
BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1169-77. doi: 10.1111/bju.12388.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Shorter Incontinence Slings.较短型尿失禁吊带的有效性与安全性
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):135-145. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05971-5. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
Instruments Used for the Assessment of SUI Severity in Urogynecologic Surgical Trials: A Scoping Review.用于妇科泌尿外科学手术试验中压力性尿失禁严重程度评估的器械:一项范围综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2255-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05934-w. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
Single Incision Sling Surgery for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Single-Institution Study.
单切口吊带手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁:一项回顾性队列单机构研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):4908. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164908.
4
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
5
Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可调吊带与其他手术方法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jul;34(7):1351-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05535-z. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence.预防压力性尿失禁女性控尿手术后感染的预防性抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012457.pub2.
7
Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review.比较盆腔器官脱垂和压力性尿失禁手术中合成网片侵蚀与慢性疼痛发生率:系统评价。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Mar;32(3):573-580. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04612-x. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Single-Incision Mini-Sling for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Is it Actually Inferior to Transobturator Vaginal Tape and Tension-Free Vaginal Tape?单切口迷你吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁:它实际上是否逊于经闭孔阴道吊带和无张力阴道吊带?
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Aug 1;9(3):123-130. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_78_19. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
9
Comparison of Two Single-Incision Mini-Slings for the Treatment of Incontinence.两种单切口迷你吊带治疗尿失禁的比较。
Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):85-91. doi: 10.1159/000511465. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.可调节微型吊带与传统中尿道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验的3年随访
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1465-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04004-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.