• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非剥脱性分次激光早期干预改善皮肤瘢痕——关于干预时间和能量密度影响的随机对照试验

Early intervention with non-ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring-A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels.

作者信息

Karmisholt Katrine E, Wenande Emily, Thaysen-Petersen Daniel, Philipsen Peter A, Paasch Uwe, Haedersdal Merete

机构信息

Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22707. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1002/lsm.22707
PMID:28815643
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Laser treatment in the early phases of wound healing may reduce scar formation. However, little is known on when in the early wound healing phases laser exposure most optimally should be provided and at which fluence levels. This study investigates the clinical effect of non-ablative-fractional-laser (NAFL) performed at three early time points at a range of fluence levels versus untreated control scars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, controlled, intra-individual trial with erbium-glass 1,540 nm NAFL versus no laser treatment on sixteen subjects receiving 10 standardized full-thickness punch-biopsy wounds. A single NAFL-exposure was applied to test-wounds 1 day before, immediately after, or 2 weeks after wounding. Three fluence levels provided deep and superficial energy depositions (range 30-70 mJ/microbeam). Primary outcome comprised the total-score of the observer part of Patient-Observer-Scar-Assessment-Scale (POSAS), performed by blinded on-site assessment at 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were clinical evaluation on visual-analogue-scale (VAS), reflectance measurements, and histology.

RESULTS

NAFL-treatment applied 1 day before, immediately after or 2 weeks after wounding had the potential to offer subtle but detectable improvement in clinical scar appearance compared to untreated controls. Thus, NAFL-exposure 1 day before wounding (POSAS-total: median of 15 vs. control-median of 16, P = 0.03, VAS: median 4.1 vs. control-median 5.5, P = 0.03, medium-fluence), as well as immediately-, and 2 weeks after wounding (POSAS-total: P ≤ 0.05, low-fluence) induced improvement compared to untreated controls. No significant differences in dyschromia were detected between NAFL-treated and control scars. Histology showed subtle changes towards more mature interwoven bundles of collagen in NAFL-treated scars as compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that a single NAFL-treatment at low to medium fluence performed 1 day prior, or in the early phases of wound healing, may have the potential to optimize scar formation in full thickness wounds. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:28-36, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景与目的

在伤口愈合早期进行激光治疗可能会减少瘢痕形成。然而,对于在伤口愈合早期的何时进行激光照射最为理想以及使用何种能量密度水平,人们了解甚少。本研究调查了在三个早期时间点、一系列能量密度水平下进行非剥脱性分数激光(NAFL)治疗与未治疗的对照瘢痕相比的临床效果。

材料与方法

一项随机、对照、个体内试验,对16名接受10个标准化全层打孔活检伤口的受试者,使用掺铒玻璃1540nm的NAFL治疗与不进行激光治疗进行对比。在伤口形成前1天、伤口形成后立即或伤口形成后2周对测试伤口进行单次NAFL照射。三种能量密度水平提供了深部和浅表能量沉积(范围为30 - 70mJ/微束)。主要结局包括患者 - 观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)观察者部分的总分,在3个月随访时由盲法现场评估得出。次要结局包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)临床评估、反射率测量和组织学检查。

结果

与未治疗的对照相比,在伤口形成前1天、伤口形成后立即或伤口形成后2周进行NAFL治疗有可能在临床瘢痕外观上带来细微但可检测到的改善。因此,伤口形成前1天进行NAFL照射(POSAS总分:中位数为15,对照中位数为16,P = 0.03,VAS:中位数4.1,对照中位数5.5,中等能量密度),以及伤口形成后立即和2周进行照射(POSAS总分:P≤0.05,低能量密度)与未治疗的对照相比均有改善。在NAFL治疗的瘢痕与对照瘢痕之间未检测到色素沉着异常的显著差异。组织学显示,与对照相比,NAFL治疗的瘢痕中胶原束向更成熟的交织状态有细微变化。

结论

本研究表明,在伤口形成前1天或伤口愈合早期进行单次低至中等能量密度的NAFL治疗,可能有潜力优化全层伤口的瘢痕形成。《激光外科与医学》50:28 - 36,2018。©2017威利期刊公司

相似文献

1
Early intervention with non-ablative fractional laser to improve cutaneous scarring-A randomized controlled trial on the impact of intervention time and fluence levels.非剥脱性分次激光早期干预改善皮肤瘢痕——关于干预时间和能量密度影响的随机对照试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):28-36. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22707. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
Laser treatments in early wound healing improve scar appearance: a randomized split-wound trial with nonablative fractional laser exposures vs. untreated controls.早期伤口愈合中的激光治疗可改善疤痕外观:非剥脱性点阵激光与未治疗对照的随机分割伤口试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;179(6):1307-1314. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17076. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
3
Fractional CO laser treatment of caesarean section scars-A randomized controlled split-scar trial with long term follow-up assessment.二氧化碳点阵激光治疗剖宫产瘢痕——一项长期随访评估的随机对照半侧瘢痕试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Feb;49(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22606. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
Non-ablative fractional laser provides long-term improvement of mature burn scars--a randomized controlled trial with histological assessment.非剥脱性分次激光可长期改善成熟烧伤瘢痕——一项带有组织学评估的随机对照试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):141-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22289. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
5
Safety of non-ablative fractional laser for acne scars within 1 month after treatment with oral isotretinoin: A randomized split-face controlled trial.口服异维A酸治疗后1个月内非剥脱性分次激光治疗痤疮瘢痕的安全性:一项随机半脸对照试验。
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Dec;49(10):886-890. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22711. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
6
1550-nm Nonablative Fractional Laser Versus 10,600-nm Ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Comparison Study on Efficacy and Treatment Regimen.1550nm 非剥脱性点阵激光与 10600nm 剥脱性点阵激光治疗手术和外伤性瘢痕的疗效和治疗方案比较研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jun;46(6):780-788. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002152.
7
Fractionated Er:YAG laser versus fully ablative Er:YAG laser for scar revision: Results of a split scar, double blinded, prospective trial.分次铒激光与完全剥脱性铒激光用于瘢痕修复:一项瘢痕切开、双盲、前瞻性试验的结果
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):837-843. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22562. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Early postoperative single treatment ablative fractional lasing of Mohs micrographic surgery facial scars: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study.Mohs显微外科手术面部瘢痕术后早期单次剥脱性分次激光治疗:一项瘢痕对分、评估者盲法研究
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Jan;47(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22314. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
Objective evaluation of the efficacy of a non-ablative fractional 1565 nm laser for the treatment of deliberate self-harm scars.非剥脱性1565纳米分数激光治疗故意自伤性瘢痕疗效的客观评估
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Feb;33(2):241-250. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2348-x. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
10
Efficacy of Combined Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) With Fractional CO -Laser Ablation in the Treatment of Large Hypertrophic Scars: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial.强脉冲光(IPL)联合剥脱性二氧化碳激光消融治疗大面积增生性瘢痕的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2019 Oct;51(8):678-685. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23092. Epub 2019 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional 1064 nm Nd: YAG picosecond lasers for the treatment of traumatic scars: a retrospective study.用于治疗创伤性瘢痕的1064纳米掺钕钇铝石榴石皮秒分数激光:一项回顾性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Dec 28;40(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04247-0.
2
Energy-Based Skin Rejuvenation: A Review of Mechanisms and Thermal Effects.基于能量的皮肤年轻化:作用机制与热效应综述
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Feb;24(2):e16657. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16657. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
3
Influence of scar age, laser type and laser treatment intervals on paediatric burn scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
瘢痕年龄、激光类型及激光治疗间隔时间对小儿烧伤瘢痕的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Burns Trauma. 2024 Feb 2;12:tkad046. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkad046. eCollection 2024.
4
Effect of Laser and Energy-based Device Therapies to Minimize Surgical Scar Formation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.激光和基于能量的设备治疗以最小化手术瘢痕形成的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Jan 8;104:adv18477. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.18477.
5
The impact on quality-of-life following treatment of surgical facial scars with laser-based therapy: a scoping review.基于激光的疗法治疗面部手术疤痕对生活质量的影响:范围综述。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Dec 16;316(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02779-z.
6
[Opinion on the photoelectric therapy of scars].[关于瘢痕的光电治疗的观点]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 20;39(6):501-506. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220821-00353.
7
Advances in Photoelectric Therapy for the Early Intervention and Treatment of Traumatic Scars.光电疗法在创伤性瘢痕早期干预与治疗中的进展
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Apr 4;16:869-877. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S407361. eCollection 2023.
8
Synergistic Sequential Emission of Fractional 10.600 and 1540 nm Lasers for Skin Resurfacing: An Ex Vivo Histological Evaluation.10.6μm 和 1540nm 激光协同顺序发射治疗皮肤换肤:离体组织学评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 19;58(9):1308. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091308.
9
Light emitting diode-red light for reduction of post-surgical scarring: Results from a dose-ranging, split-face, randomized controlled trial.发光二极管-红光治疗减少术后瘢痕:一项剂量范围、分割面部、随机对照试验的结果。
J Biophotonics. 2021 Jul;14(7):e202100073. doi: 10.1002/jbio.202100073. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Laser management of hypertrophic burn scars: a comprehensive review.肥厚性烧伤瘢痕的激光治疗:综述
Burns Trauma. 2020 Jan 16;8:tkz002. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkz002. eCollection 2020.