Suppr超能文献

每日 2 次与每日 3 次和 4 次服用控释对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)的生物等效性和安全性比较:一项在健康志愿者中进行的重复剂量、交叉药代动力学研究。

Bioequivalence and Safety of Twice-Daily Sustained-Release Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) Compared With 3- and 4-Times-Daily Paracetamol: A Repeat-Dose, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study in Healthy Volunteers.

机构信息

Clinical Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Biostatistics Department, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Parsippany, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2018 Jan;7(1):77-86. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.369. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

Abstract

Twice-daily sustained-release (SR) paracetamol (acetaminophen) offers convenient administration to chronic users. This study investigated at steady state (during the last 24 hours of a 3-day dosing period) the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of twice-daily SR paracetamol compared with extended-release (ER) and immediate-release (IR) paracetamol. In this open-label, randomized, multidose, 3-way crossover study, 28 healthy subjects received paracetamol SR (2 × 1000 mg twice daily), ER (2 × 665 mg 3 times daily), and IR (2 × 500 mg 4 times daily). At steady state, twice-daily SR paracetamol was bioequivalent to ER and IR paracetamol. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of geometric means were within the acceptance interval for SR/ER paracetamol (AUC , 0.973-1.033; AUC , 0.974-1.034; AUC , 0.948-1.011; C , 1.082-1.212; C , 1.011-1.106) and SR/IR paracetamol (AUC , 0.969-1.029; AUC , 0.968-1.027; AUC , 0.963-1.026; C , 0.902-1.010; C , 1.004-1.098). Given twice daily, the SR formulation demonstrated SR properties as expected. Mean time at or above a 4 μg/mL plasma concentration of paracetamol from 2 daily doses of the SR formulation was significantly longer than that from 4 daily doses of IR paracetamol. SR formulation also had a greater T , a longer half-life, and lower C compared with ER and IR paracetamol. All formulations were well tolerated.

摘要

每日 2 次的控释(SR)对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)为慢性使用者提供了方便的给药方式。本研究旨在稳态下(3 天给药期的最后 24 小时)比较每日 2 次 SR 对乙酰氨基酚与控释(ER)和即刻释放(IR)对乙酰氨基酚的药代动力学、生物等效性和安全性。在这项开放标签、随机、多剂量、3 向交叉研究中,28 名健康受试者接受了 SR 对乙酰氨基酚(2×1000mg,每日 2 次)、ER 对乙酰氨基酚(2×665mg,每日 3 次)和 IR 对乙酰氨基酚(2×500mg,每日 4 次)。在稳态下,每日 2 次 SR 对乙酰氨基酚与 ER 和 IR 对乙酰氨基酚生物等效。SR/ER 对乙酰氨基酚(AUC ,0.973-1.033;AUC ,0.974-1.034;AUC ,0.948-1.011;C ,1.082-1.212;C ,1.011-1.106)和 SR/IR 对乙酰氨基酚(AUC ,0.969-1.029;AUC ,0.968-1.027;AUC ,0.963-1.026;C ,0.902-1.010;C ,1.004-1.098)的几何均数比值的 90%置信区间在接受区间内。与每日 4 次 IR 对乙酰氨基酚相比,每日 2 次 SR 制剂从 2 次每日剂量中达到或高于 4μg/ml 对乙酰氨基酚血浆浓度的平均时间显著延长。SR 制剂还具有更大的 T 、更长的半衰期和更低的 C ,与 ER 和 IR 对乙酰氨基酚相比。所有制剂均耐受良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88c5/6084369/dd34dbe41e33/CPDD-7-77-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验