As above, so below? Towards understanding inverse models in BCI.

OBJECTIVE

In brain-computer interfaces (BCI), measurements of the user's brain activity are classified into commands for the computer. With EEG-based BCIs, the origins of the classified phenomena are often considered to be spatially localized in the cortical volume and mixed in the EEG. We investigate if more accurate BCIs can be obtained by reconstructing the source activities in the volume.

APPROACH

We contrast the physiology-driven source reconstruction with data-driven representations obtained by statistical machine learning. We explain these approaches in a common linear dictionary framework and review the different ways to obtain the dictionary parameters. We consider the effect of source reconstruction on some major difficulties in BCI classification, namely information loss, feature selection and nonstationarity of the EEG.

MAIN RESULTS

Our analysis suggests that the approaches differ mainly in their parameter estimation. Physiological source reconstruction may thus be expected to improve BCI accuracy if machine learning is not used or where it produces less optimal parameters. We argue that the considered difficulties of surface EEG classification can remain in the reconstructed volume and that data-driven techniques are still necessary. Finally, we provide some suggestions for comparing approaches.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present work illustrates the relationships between source reconstruction and machine learning-based approaches for EEG data representation. The provided analysis and discussion should help in understanding, applying, comparing and improving such techniques in the future.