• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质类固醇与利多卡因注射治疗网球肘的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。

Comparison Between Corticosteroid and Lidocaine Injection in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.

机构信息

From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (L-FH, Y-CK, C-CL, Y-CL); School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan (L-FH, Y-FL); Department of Education and Research, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Y-FL); and Department of Orthopedics, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (VH).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;97(2):83-89. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000814.

DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000814
PMID:28816704
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of corticosteroid injection with lidocaine injection in treating tennis elbow.

DESIGN

It is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients with tennis elbow for more than 1 mo were recruited from a hospital-based rehabilitation outpatient clinic. A total of 70 patients were recruited, and 61 patients completed the study. Patients received an injection of either 10 mg (1 ml) of triamcinolone (corticosteroid group, n = 30) or 1 ml of 1% lidocaine (lidocaine group, n = 31). All of the outcome measures were evaluated before the intervention and at 2 wks and 2 mos after treatment.

RESULTS

No significant group differences were observed between the corticosteroid and lidocaine groups regarding Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, visual analog scale for pain, and grip strength at baseline and at 2 wks and 2 mos after treatment (P > 0.05). However, within-group comparison showed significant improvement after injection with regard to Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, visual analog scale for pain, and grip strength in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in the short-term outcomes were found between lidocaine and corticosteroid injection in a small sample of people with tennis elbow with mean duration of 3.8 mos.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较皮质类固醇注射与利多卡因注射治疗网球肘的效果。

设计

前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。从基于医院的康复门诊招募患有网球肘超过 1 个月的患者。共招募了 70 名患者,其中 61 名完成了研究。患者接受 10 mg(1 ml)曲安奈德(皮质类固醇组,n = 30)或 1 ml 1%利多卡因(利多卡因组,n = 31)注射。所有结局指标均在干预前和治疗后 2 周和 2 个月进行评估。

结果

皮质类固醇组和利多卡因组在基线时和治疗后 2 周和 2 个月的患者自评网球肘评估、手臂、肩部和手部残疾、疼痛视觉模拟量表和握力方面,组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。然而,组内比较显示两组在注射后患者自评网球肘评估、手臂、肩部和手部残疾、疼痛视觉模拟量表和握力均有显著改善(P > 0.05)。

结论

在患有平均病程为 3.8 个月的网球肘的小样本患者中,利多卡因和皮质类固醇注射在短期结局方面无差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between Corticosteroid and Lidocaine Injection in the Treatment of Tennis Elbow: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.皮质类固醇与利多卡因注射治疗网球肘的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;97(2):83-89. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000814.
2
Comparison between botulinum toxin and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of acute and subacute tennis elbow: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active drug-controlled pilot study.肉毒杆菌毒素与皮质类固醇注射治疗急性和亚急性网球肘的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、活性药物对照的试点研究。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;89(8):653-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf564d.
3
Comparison Between Steroid and 2 Different Sites of Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Drug-Controlled Pilot Study.类固醇与肉毒杆菌毒素注射两个不同部位治疗外侧上髁炎的比较:一项随机、双盲、活性药物对照的试点研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;98(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.475. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
4
Pain relief after intratendinous injections in patients with tennis elbow: results of a randomised study.网球肘患者经皮内注射后的疼痛缓解:一项随机研究的结果
Br J Sports Med. 2008 Apr;42(4):267-71. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.042762. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
5
Muscle energy technique versus corticosteroid injection for management of chronic lateral epicondylitis: randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.肌内效贴布贴扎联合运动疗法对比皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎:一项 1 年随访的随机对照研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.022. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
6
PRP versus steroids in a deadlock for efficacy: long-term stability versus short-term intensity-results from a randomised trial.富血小板血浆与类固醇在疗效上陷入僵局:长期稳定性与短期强度——来自一项随机试验的结果。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Dec;104(3):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00619-w. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
Autologous blood versus corticosteroid local injection in the short-term treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy.自体血与皮质类固醇局部注射治疗外侧肘肌腱病的短期疗效:一项随机临床试验
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Aug;89(8):660-7. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ddcb31.
8
Prolotherapy versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of lateral epicondylosis: a randomized controlled trial.富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗与皮质类固醇注射治疗网球肘的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
PM R. 2011 Aug;3(8):706-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.011.
9
Comparison of autologous blood, corticosteroid, and saline injection in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study.自体血、皮质类固醇和生理盐水注射治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Aug;36(8):1269-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
10
Exercise and Therapeutic Ultrasound Compared with Corticosteroid Injection for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.运动和治疗性超声与皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015 Jul-Aug;17(4):351-7. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1173377.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of kinesiotape, counterforce brace, and corticosteroid injection in patients with tennis elbow: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.肌内效贴、反力支具和皮质类固醇注射治疗网球肘的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328396. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceived Pain Severity and Disability After the Recurrence of Tennis Elbow Following a Local Corticosteroid Injection.局部皮质类固醇注射后网球肘复发的疼痛严重程度和功能障碍感知
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Sep;10(9):760-765. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.56951.2826.
3
Lateral epicondylitis: New trends and challenges in treatment.
外侧上髁炎:治疗的新趋势与挑战
World J Orthop. 2022 Apr 18;13(4):354-364. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i4.354.
4
Peppering versus Single Injection Technique in Tennis Elbow - A Prospective Comparative Study.网球肘的点状注射与单次注射技术——一项前瞻性对比研究
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Mar;16(1):91-96. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.013.
5
Short-term outcomes of subacromial injection of combined corticosteroid with low-volume compared to high-volume local anesthetic for rotator cuff impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.与高容量局部麻醉剂联合皮质类固醇肩峰下注射相比,低容量局部麻醉剂联合皮质类固醇肩峰下注射治疗肩袖撞击综合征的短期疗效:一项随机对照非劣效性试验
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Aug;28(6):1079-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2149-3. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Comparative outcomes of combined corticosteroid with low volume compared to high volume of local anesthetic in subacromial injection for impingement syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.肩峰下注射皮质类固醇联合小剂量与大剂量局部麻醉药治疗撞击综合征的比较结果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2056-z. Epub 2017 Oct 12.