Asghari Ehsan, Zarifian Ahmadreza, Shariyate Mohammad Javad, Kachooei Amir R
Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ehsan Asghari and Ahmadreza Zarifian equally contributed as co-first authors.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Sep;10(9):760-765. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.56951.2826.
We hypothesized that there is no difference in the perceived pain and disability when the tennis elbow symptoms recur after a corticosteroid injection (CSI). Consequently, we secondarily aimed to assess the approximate time from CSI until symptom recurrence. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate factors associated with the time to recurrence.
This cross-sectional study was performed during 2018-2019. We enrolled 50 consecutive patients who presented with the recurrence of tennis elbow symptoms and had a history of a single CSI for this condition. We asked the patients to rate the perceived pain and disability by filling the QuickDASH twice, including one by recalling pain and function before the CSI and one for the recent recurrent symptoms to assess the patient's perceived pain and disability at the two-time points.
There was a significant difference in perceived pain VAS and disability QuickDASH between pre-injection and recurrence, showing that the patient's perceived pain and disability were greater when recurred (P<0.001). The mean time between CSI and recurrence of symptoms was 6 (4-7) months, which is shorter than the expected spontaneous resolution of tennis elbow (> 1 year) to offer other invasive treatments. Time to recurrence had no significant association with sex, age, side, education, occupation, pre-injection VAS score, pre-injection QuickDASH, or symptom duration using a linear regression model.
Although CSI seems to relieve or mask the pain in the short term, there is a considerable chance of recurrence, and patients may perceive more significant pain and disability that may lead to subsequent injection or precocious surgery. Time is an effective treatment for this illness. Shared decision-making is paramount, and patients have to be counseled regarding the natural history and expected prognosis of different treatments.
我们假设,在皮质类固醇注射(CSI)后网球肘症状复发时,患者感知到的疼痛和功能障碍并无差异。因此,我们的次要目标是评估从CSI到症状复发的大致时间。此外,我们旨在评估与复发时间相关的因素。
这项横断面研究于2018年至2019年期间进行。我们连续纳入了50例出现网球肘症状复发且曾因该病接受过单次CSI治疗的患者。我们让患者通过两次填写QuickDASH来对其感知到的疼痛和功能障碍进行评分,一次是回忆CSI前的疼痛和功能情况,另一次是针对近期复发症状,以评估患者在这两个时间点的疼痛和功能障碍感知情况。
注射前与复发时的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和功能障碍QuickDASH评分存在显著差异,表明复发时患者感知到的疼痛和功能障碍更严重(P<0.001)。CSI与症状复发之间的平均时间为6(4 - 7)个月,这比网球肘预期的自然缓解时间(>1年)短,提示需要采取其他侵入性治疗。使用线性回归模型分析,复发时间与性别、年龄、患侧、教育程度、职业、注射前VAS评分、注射前QuickDASH评分或症状持续时间均无显著关联[。
尽管CSI似乎能在短期内缓解或掩盖疼痛,但复发的可能性很大,且患者可能会感到更严重的疼痛和功能障碍,这可能导致后续注射或过早手术。时间是治疗这种疾病的有效方法。共同决策至关重要,必须向患者咨询不同治疗方法的自然病程和预期预后。