Lops Diego, Parpaiola Andrea, Paniz Gianluca, Sbricoli Luca, Magaz Vanessa Ruiz, Venezze Alvise Cenzi, Bressan Eriberto, Stellini Edoardo
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Sep/Oct;37(5):657-665. doi: 10.11607/prd.3184.
The aim of this study was to compare the interproximal papilla stability of restorations supported by computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) abutments to those supported by prefabricated stock abutments in anterior areas over a 2-year follow-up. Abutments were selected depending on implant inclination and thickness of buccal peri-implant soft tissues from the following: zirconia stock, titanium stock, zirconia CAD/CAM and titanium CAD/CAM. Differences between the height of the papilla tip were measured (REC).
REC values of titanium and zirconia CAD/CAM abutments were significantly lower than those of titanium and zirconia stock. The use of titanium and zirconia CAD/CAM abutments is related to better interproximal papillae stability.
本研究的目的是比较在2年的随访期内,计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)基台支持的修复体与预制成品基台支持的修复体在前牙区的邻间隙乳头稳定性。根据种植体倾斜度和颊侧种植体周围软组织厚度,从以下几种基台中进行选择:氧化锆成品、钛成品、氧化锆CAD/CAM和钛CAD/CAM。测量乳头尖端高度的差异(REC)。
钛和氧化锆CAD/CAM基台的REC值显著低于钛和氧化锆成品。使用钛和氧化锆CAD/CAM基台与更好的邻间隙乳头稳定性相关。