• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对价格比较和价格透明度的看法。

Patients' views on price shopping and price transparency.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jun 1;23(6):e186-e192.

PMID:28817296
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Driven by the growth of high deductibles and price transparency initiatives, patients are being encouraged to search for prices before seeking care, yet few do so. To understand why this is the case, we interviewed individuals who were offered access to a widely used price transparency website through their employer.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative interviews.

METHODS

We interviewed individuals enrolled in a preferred provider organization product through their health plan about their experience using the price transparency tool (if they had done so), their past medical experiences, and their opinions on shopping for care. All interviews were transcribed and manually coded using a thematic coding guide.

RESULTS

In general, respondents expressed frustration with healthcare costs and had a positive opinion of the idea of price shopping in theory, but 2 sets of barriers limited their ability to do so in reality. The first was the salience of searching for price information. For example, respondents recognized that due to their health plan benefits design, they would not save money by switching to a lower-cost provider. Second, other factors were more important than price for respondents when choosing a provider, including quality and loyalty to current providers.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a disconnect between respondents' enthusiasm for price shopping and their reported use of a price transparency tool to shop for care. However, many did find the tool useful for other purposes, including checking their claims history. Addressing the barriers to price shopping identified by respondents can help inform ongoing and future price transparency initiatives.

摘要

目的

由于高自付额和价格透明度倡议的增长,鼓励患者在寻求护理前先查询价格,但很少有人这样做。为了了解为什么会这样,我们采访了一些通过雇主获得广泛使用的价格透明度网站访问权限的个人。

研究设计

定性访谈。

方法

我们采访了通过健康计划参加优选提供者组织产品的个人,了解他们使用价格透明度工具(如果使用过)的经验、他们过去的医疗经历以及他们对医疗护理购物的看法。所有访谈均进行了转录,并使用主题编码指南进行手动编码。

结果

总体而言,受访者对医疗保健费用感到不满,对价格购物的想法在理论上持积极态度,但有 2 组障碍限制了他们在现实中这样做的能力。第一个是搜索价格信息的突出性。例如,受访者认识到,由于他们的健康计划福利设计,他们不会通过转向低成本提供者来节省资金。其次,对于受访者来说,在选择提供者时,其他因素比价格更重要,包括质量和对当前提供者的忠诚度。

结论

我们发现,受访者对价格购物的热情与其报告的使用价格透明度工具进行护理购物之间存在脱节。然而,许多人确实发现该工具在其他方面很有用,包括检查他们的索赔历史。解决受访者确定的价格购物障碍可以帮助为正在进行和未来的价格透明度倡议提供信息。

相似文献

1
Patients' views on price shopping and price transparency.患者对价格比较和价格透明度的看法。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Jun 1;23(6):e186-e192.
2
A health plan work in progress: hospital-physician price and quality transparency.一项正在推进的医疗计划:医院与医生的价格及质量透明度
Res Brief. 2008 Aug(7):1-8.
3
Offering A Price Transparency Tool Did Not Reduce Overall Spending Among California Public Employees And Retirees.提供价格透明度工具并未降低加利福尼亚州公共雇员和退休人员的总体支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1401-1407. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1636.
4
Americans Support Price Shopping For Health Care, But Few Actually Seek Out Price Information.美国人支持医疗保健价格比较,但很少有人真正寻求价格信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1471.
5
Provider responses to online price transparency.医疗机构对线上价格透明度的回应。
J Health Econ. 2019 Jul;66:241-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Who Uses a Price Transparency Tool? Implications for Increasing Consumer Engagement.谁使用价格透明度工具?对提高消费者参与度的影响。
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017709104. doi: 10.1177/0046958017709104.
7
Association between availability of health service prices and payments for these services.卫生服务价格的可及性与这些服务的支付之间的关联。
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1670-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13373.
8
Consumer-Directed Health Care: The Uncertain Future of Price Transparency Initiatives.消费者导向型医疗保健:价格透明度倡议的不确定未来。
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):783-784. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.031. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Examining A Health Care Price Transparency Tool: Who Uses It, And How They Shop For Care.审视一种医疗保健价格透明度工具:谁在使用它,以及他们如何选购医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):662-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0746.
10
Shopping for price in medical care.在医疗保健领域寻找价格优势。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):w208-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.w208. Epub 2007 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncologic Surgery in the United States: Do You Get What You Pay For?美国的肿瘤外科手术:物有所值吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4167-4168. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15298-6. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Patterns of Use of a Price Transparency Tool for Childbirth Among Pregnant Individuals With Commercial Insurance.商业保险孕妇使用分娩价格透明工具的模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21410.
3
Health Care Consumer Shopping Behaviors and Sentiment: Qualitative Study.医疗保健消费者的购物行为与情绪:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2020 Jun 16;12(2):e13924. doi: 10.2196/13924.
4
Consumer Prices for Surgical Management of Ankle Arthritis: Limited Availability and Wide Variability.踝关节关节炎手术治疗的消费价格:供应有限且差异很大。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2019 Jul 8;3(7):e011. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00011. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
Utilization of over-the-counter analgesics in two private medical insurance schemes in South Africa.南非两个私人医疗保险计划中非处方镇痛药的使用情况。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2019 Jul 17;11:37-45. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S194347. eCollection 2019.
6
Does Enrollment in High-Deductible Health Plans Encourage Price Shopping?参加高免赔额健康计划是否会鼓励价格比较?
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2718-2734. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12784. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
7
Who Uses a Price Transparency Tool? Implications for Increasing Consumer Engagement.谁使用价格透明度工具?对提高消费者参与度的影响。
Inquiry. 2017 Jan 1;54:46958017709104. doi: 10.1177/0046958017709104.