Suppr超能文献

保释金没收与审前释放机制之间的联系:以得克萨斯州达拉斯县为例。

The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas.

作者信息

Clipper Stephen J, Morris Robert G, Russell-Kaplan Amanda

机构信息

Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America.

Department of Criminology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0182772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182772. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of four pretrial jail release mechanisms (i.e., bond types) commonly used during the pretrial phase of the criminal justice process in terms of their ability to discriminate between defendants failing to appear in court (i.e., bond forfeiture). These include attorney bonds, cash bonds, commercial bail bonds, and release via a pretrial services agency.

METHODS

A multi-treatment propensity score matching protocol was employed to assess between-release-mechanism differences in the conditional probability of failure to appear/bond forfeiture. Data were culled from archival state justice records comprising all defendants booked into the Dallas County, Texas jail during 2008 (n = 29,416).

RESULTS

The results suggest that defendants released via commercial bail bonds were less likely to experience failure to appear leading to the bond forfeiture process compared to equivalent defendants released via cash, attorney, and pretrial services bonds. This finding held across different offense categories. The study frames these differences within a discussion encompassing procedural variation within and between each release mechanism, thereby setting the stage for further research and dialog regarding potential justice reform.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估刑事司法程序审前阶段常用的四种审前监狱释放机制(即保释类型)在区分未出庭被告(即保释金没收)方面的有效性。这些机制包括律师保释、现金保释、商业保释债券以及通过审前服务机构释放。

方法

采用多处理倾向得分匹配方案来评估不同释放机制在未出庭/保释金没收条件概率上的差异。数据取自德克萨斯州达拉斯县监狱2008年登记的所有被告的档案司法记录(n = 29,416)。

结果

结果表明,与通过现金、律师和审前服务保释释放的同等被告相比,通过商业保释债券释放的被告未出庭导致保释金没收程序的可能性较小。这一发现适用于不同的犯罪类别。该研究在讨论每种释放机制内部和之间的程序差异的框架内阐述了这些差异,从而为进一步研究以及关于潜在司法改革的对话奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d13/5560530/5bd15d8f1a7b/pone.0182772.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验