Weissman J C, Marr S W, Lawrie E
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980 Apr;5(4):311-9. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(80)90005-8.
The relationship between addiction and pretrial performance has attracted increasing attention in the diversion and bail study literature. Many jurisdictions have imposed special restrictive bail conditions upon the bail agreements of addict defendants on the heretofore unproven assumption that appropriate remedial conditions of release (for example, supervised drug abuse treatment) will improve the pretrial release performance of addict defendants. To determine the validity of these assumptions, the pretrial release performance of three groups (addict defendants without treatment program, and non-addict, unsupervised felony defendants) was examined. The results indicate that, measured in terms of appearance at scheduled court proceedings, the unsupervised, untreated addict defendants are poorer bond risks than the non-addict felony defendants, but that the court appearance performance of the supervised, treated addicts was equivalent to the performance of the non-addicts. Rearrest data showed virtually no difference between the groups for non-drug offenses, although the addict groups displayed significantly higher overall rearrest rates.
成瘾与审前表现之间的关系在转处与保释研究文献中已引起越来越多的关注。许多司法管辖区基于一种迄今未经证实的假设，即适当的释放补救条件（例如，监督下的药物滥用治疗）将改善成瘾被告的审前释放表现，对成瘾被告的保释协议施加了特殊的限制性保释条件。为了确定这些假设的有效性，研究了三组人员（未参加治疗项目的成瘾被告以及非成瘾、无监督的重罪被告）的审前释放表现。结果表明，就按预定法庭程序出庭情况衡量，未受监督、未接受治疗的成瘾被告比非成瘾重罪被告的保释风险更高，但接受监督、接受治疗的成瘾者的出庭表现与非成瘾者相当。再次被捕数据显示，在非毒品犯罪方面，各群体之间几乎没有差异，尽管成瘾群体的总体再次被捕率明显更高。
