Suppr超能文献

成瘾被告的审前释放表现:法庭缺席和再次逮捕率的调查。

Pretrial release performance of addict defendants: examination of court non-appearance and rearrest rates.

作者信息

Weissman J C, Marr S W, Lawrie E

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980 Apr;5(4):311-9. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(80)90005-8.

Abstract

The relationship between addiction and pretrial performance has attracted increasing attention in the diversion and bail study literature. Many jurisdictions have imposed special restrictive bail conditions upon the bail agreements of addict defendants on the heretofore unproven assumption that appropriate remedial conditions of release (for example, supervised drug abuse treatment) will improve the pretrial release performance of addict defendants. To determine the validity of these assumptions, the pretrial release performance of three groups (addict defendants without treatment program, and non-addict, unsupervised felony defendants) was examined. The results indicate that, measured in terms of appearance at scheduled court proceedings, the unsupervised, untreated addict defendants are poorer bond risks than the non-addict felony defendants, but that the court appearance performance of the supervised, treated addicts was equivalent to the performance of the non-addicts. Rearrest data showed virtually no difference between the groups for non-drug offenses, although the addict groups displayed significantly higher overall rearrest rates.

摘要

成瘾与审前表现之间的关系在转处与保释研究文献中已引起越来越多的关注。许多司法管辖区基于一种迄今未经证实的假设,即适当的释放补救条件(例如,监督下的药物滥用治疗)将改善成瘾被告的审前释放表现,对成瘾被告的保释协议施加了特殊的限制性保释条件。为了确定这些假设的有效性,研究了三组人员(未参加治疗项目的成瘾被告以及非成瘾、无监督的重罪被告)的审前释放表现。结果表明,就按预定法庭程序出庭情况衡量,未受监督、未接受治疗的成瘾被告比非成瘾重罪被告的保释风险更高,但接受监督、接受治疗的成瘾者的出庭表现与非成瘾者相当。再次被捕数据显示,在非毒品犯罪方面,各群体之间几乎没有差异,尽管成瘾群体的总体再次被捕率明显更高。

相似文献

1
Pretrial release performance of addict defendants: examination of court non-appearance and rearrest rates.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980 Apr;5(4):311-9. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(80)90005-8.
3
Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes.
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;46(4):277-289. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000487. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0182772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182772. eCollection 2017.
5
Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Oct;46(5):337-352. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000495.
6
Evaluation of a liaison and diversion Court Mental Health Service for defendants with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Dec;119:104103. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104103. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Assessing Risk-Based Policies for Pretrial Release and Split Sentencing in Los Angeles County Jails.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0144967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144967. eCollection 2015.
8
9
Arrests two years after exiting a well-established mental health court.
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 May;61(5):463-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.463.
10
Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(1):34-43.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验