• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较金钱保释、审前风险评分与审前结果之间的关系。

Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes.

机构信息

Policy Research Associates, Inc.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;46(4):277-289. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000487. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1037/lhb0000487
PMID:35679191
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There has been much discussion around the use of both money bail and pretrial risk assessment instruments. We examine how bail and risk scores compare in terms of their associations with failure to appear in court and rearrest during the pretrial period.

HYPOTHESES

Our research questions included whether bail and risk scores differed between people who did and did not experience pretrial outcomes and whether pretrial scores were associated with outcomes when controlling for bail and other relevant covariates.

METHOD

To examine these associations, we drew a sample of 492 people (33% women; 60% Black) booked into county jail in a jurisdiction not yet using a pretrial risk assessment instrument to inform release decisions. We completed the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) for this sample and collected data on failure-to-appear and rearrest incidents for 1 year following initial bookings. We examined the associations between bail amount, failure to appear, and rearrest and between PSA subscale scores, failure to appear, and rearrest.

RESULTS

Bail amount was not associated with either failure to appear or rearrest. People who failed to appear or were rearrested had higher bail amounts, on average, than people who did not. In contrast, PSA subscale scores were significantly associated with outcomes in the expected direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support the use of money bail for ensuring that people return to court and avoid rearrest. Instead, our findings suggest that using pretrial risk assessment, instruments could result in more accurate and appropriate release decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

围绕着使用保释金和审前风险评估工具,已经进行了大量的讨论。我们研究了在与审前期间不出庭和再逮捕相关方面,保释金和风险评分的关联有何不同。

假设

我们的研究问题包括在经历和不经历审前结果的人群中,保释金和风险评分是否存在差异,以及在控制保释金和其他相关协变量的情况下,审前评分是否与结果相关。

方法

为了检验这些关联,我们从一个尚未使用审前风险评估工具来决定释放的司法管辖区的县监狱中抽取了 492 人的样本(33%为女性;60%为黑人)。我们对该样本进行了公共安全评估(PSA),并收集了在最初预订后的 1 年内,不出庭和再逮捕事件的数据。我们检验了保释金金额、不出庭和再逮捕之间的关联,以及 PSA 子量表评分、不出庭和再逮捕之间的关联。

结果

保释金金额与不出庭或再逮捕均无关联。不出庭或再逮捕的人平均保释金金额较高。相比之下,PSA 子量表评分与预期方向的结果显著相关。

结论

我们的发现不支持使用保释金来确保人们回到法庭并避免再逮捕。相反,我们的发现表明,使用审前风险评估工具可能会导致更准确和适当的释放决策。

相似文献

1
Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes.比较金钱保释、审前风险评分与审前结果之间的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;46(4):277-289. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000487. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
2
Predictive bias in pretrial risk assessment: Application of the Public Safety Assessment in a Native American population.审前风险评估中的预测偏差:公共安全评估在美洲原住民群体中的应用。
Law Hum Behav. 2024 Oct-Dec;48(5-6):398-414. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000562. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
3
Employing standardized risk assessment in pretrial release decisions: Association with criminal justice outcomes and racial equity.在审前释放决策中采用标准化风险评估:与刑事司法结果和种族公平的关联。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;44(5):361-376. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000413.
4
The link between bond forfeiture and pretrial release mechanism: The case of Dallas County, Texas.保释金没收与审前释放机制之间的联系:以得克萨斯州达拉斯县为例。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0182772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182772. eCollection 2017.
5
Pretrial release performance of addict defendants: examination of court non-appearance and rearrest rates.成瘾被告的审前释放表现:法庭缺席和再次逮捕率的调查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1980 Apr;5(4):311-9. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(80)90005-8.
6
Justice involvement prediction as individuals age: An age-graded evaluation of the public safety assessment.随着个体年龄的增长,预测其涉法情况:公共安全评估的年龄分级评价。
Law Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;48(2):148-161. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000556.
7
Homelessness and pretrial detention predict unfavorable outcomes in the plea bargaining process.无家可归和审前拘留会预测辩诉交易过程中的不利结果。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):201-213. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000484.
8
Assessing Risk-Based Policies for Pretrial Release and Split Sentencing in Los Angeles County Jails.评估洛杉矶县监狱基于风险的审前释放和分离判决政策。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0144967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144967. eCollection 2015.
9
The impact of defense counsel at bail hearings.辩护律师在保释听证会上的影响。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 5;9(18):eade3909. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade3909.
10
Impact of risk assessment instruments on rates of pretrial detention, postconviction placements, and release: A systematic review and meta-analysis.风险评估工具对审前拘留率、定罪后安置率和释放率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;43(5):397-420. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000344. Epub 2019 Aug 15.