Rousset-Jablonski Christine, Gompel Anne
Centre Léon Bérard, Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, F- 69008, France; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Département de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Groupe Hospitalier Sud, F-69495, Pierre Benite Cedex, France; Université de Lyon, EA 7425 HESPER- Health Services and Performance Research, F-69003, Lyon, France.
Université Paris Descartes, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Cochin Port Royal, Unité de Gynécologie Endocrinienne, Paris, France.
Maturitas. 2017 Nov;105:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
A breast or an ovarian cancer occurring at a young age and/or in a family where other cases preexist suggests that those patients should be candidates for screening for mutations. Despite decades of medical research, less than 30% of cases with a suggestive personal and/or family history of hereditary breast cancer have an identified causative gene mutation. The vast majority of these cases are due to a mutation in one of the highly penetrant breast cancer genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, TP53, CDH1, and STK11) and various guidelines direct the management of these patients. A minority of cases are due to mutations in moderate-penetrance genes (PALB2, ATM, BRIP1, and CHEK2). A small number of low-penetrance alleles have been identified using advanced genetic testing methods. While these may contribute to risk in a polygenic fashion, this is likely to be relevant to a minority of cases and their identification should not be considered routine practice. Mutation testing currently requires a high index of suspicion for a specific contributing etiology, but next-generation sequencing may improve the identification of such genes and the clinical management of these cases. Where no genetic susceptibility is identified, lifetime breast cancer risk can be calculated with standard tools. Breast cancer risk management then depends on the calculated lifetime risk. The psychological consequences of such screening for mutation carriers and non-carriers are discussed.
年轻时发生的乳腺癌或卵巢癌,和/或家族中存在其他病例,表明这些患者应作为筛查突变的对象。尽管进行了数十年的医学研究,但在有遗传性乳腺癌个人和/或家族史提示的病例中,只有不到30%的病例发现了致病基因突变。这些病例中的绝大多数是由于高 penetrance 乳腺癌基因(BRCA1、BRCA2、PTEN、TP53、CDH1和STK11)之一发生突变,各种指南指导着这些患者的管理。少数病例是由于中等 penetrance 基因(PALB2、ATM、BRIP1和CHEK2)发生突变。使用先进的基因检测方法已经鉴定出少数低 penetrance 等位基因。虽然这些可能以多基因方式增加风险,但这可能只与少数病例相关,其鉴定不应被视为常规做法。目前,突变检测需要对特定的致病病因有高度怀疑指数,但下一代测序可能会改善此类基因的鉴定以及这些病例的临床管理。如果未发现遗传易感性,可以使用标准工具计算终生患乳腺癌风险。乳腺癌风险管理随后取决于计算出的终生风险。文中讨论了这种对突变携带者和非携带者进行筛查的心理后果。