de Carvalho R W F, Vasconcelos B C
PhD Program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.
PhD Program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Feb;47(2):234-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
This study aimed to develop and validate an index of surgical difficulty for the removal of impacted lower third molars. The study was performed in two steps. The first was a cross-sectional analysis of clinical, demographic, and radiographic variables collected from patients undergoing the removal of an impacted lower third molar between 2008 and 2012. The second step was a prospective cohort study involving the same surgical procedures to validate the index; this was performed between 2013 and 2016. Univariate regression analysis was applied, followed by multiple linear regression analysis. A total of 753 surgical procedures were analyzed in the first stage, which led to the identification of the most important variables and their levels of significance. The index was then applied to 280 surgical procedures. The preoperative difficulty was in concordance with the index results in all cases. Among cases with a low level of difficulty, 93.1% had been indexed as low difficulty; likewise, among cases with a high level of difficulty, there was 87.9% concordance with the index. With the use of reference statistics in the development and quality assurance processes, this validated index has proven to be a reliable and easily applicable instrument, with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
本研究旨在开发并验证一个用于拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的手术难度指数。该研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段是对2008年至2012年间接受下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术的患者所收集的临床、人口统计学和影像学变量进行横断面分析。第二阶段是一项前瞻性队列研究,采用相同的手术程序来验证该指数;此阶段于2013年至2016年间进行。先应用单因素回归分析,随后进行多元线性回归分析。在第一阶段共分析了753例手术,从而确定了最重要的变量及其显著性水平。然后将该指数应用于280例手术。所有病例的术前难度均与指数结果一致。在低难度病例中,93.1%被指数判定为低难度;同样,在高难度病例中,与指数的一致性为87.9%。通过在开发和质量保证过程中使用参考统计数据,这个经过验证的指数已被证明是一种可靠且易于应用的工具,具有高敏感性、特异性和准确性。