Suppr超能文献

体力活动动机问卷(RM4-FM)的效度和信度

Validity and reliability of the motivation for physical activity (RM4-FM) questionnaire.

作者信息

Uimonen Mikko, Repo Jussi P, Grönroos Kiira, Häkkinen Arja, Walker Simon

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Health Sciences, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Apr 27;17(2):103-111. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142194.097. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

There is a lack of validated instruments measuring motivation for physical activity (RM4-FM) in the Finnish language. The study examined the translated RM4-FM instrument's psychometric properties in a sample of healthy, older Finnish adults. RM4-FM was translated and linguistically validated adhering to published guidelines. 65-75-year olds (n=102), completed the RM4-FM, the physical activity acceptance questionnaire (PAAQ) and sociodemographic characteristics questionnaires electronically. The RM4-FM was readministered one month after the initial assessment. RM4-FM translated well into Finnish. Motivation dimension scores were skewed towards high internal and low external motivation. A floor effect was confirmed in the dimension and a ceiling effect was confirmed in the dimension. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated inadequacy of the four-dimension model. Separate assessment of each of the four motivation dimensions with Exploratory factor analysis showed unidimensionality for all dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis provided a best-fit model of three factors (influence of other people, intention of well-being and emotional aspect of motivation). Readministration of the instruments showed good test-retest reliability in all motivation dimensions. Female gender, higher education, and higher PAAQ score were associated with higher internal motivation and lower external motivation scores. The Finnish version of the RM4-FM instrument provides valid and reliable scores in assessing motivation for physical activity in healthy, older Finnish adults. The score distributions suggested shortages in the scale when evaluating internal motivation. The three-factor model of the RM4-FM provided more favorable structural validity compared to the original version.

摘要

目前缺乏经过验证的芬兰语版身体活动动机测量工具(RM4 - FM)。本研究在健康的芬兰老年成年人样本中检验了翻译后的RM4 - FM工具的心理测量特性。RM4 - FM按照已发表的指南进行翻译并经过语言验证。65至75岁的老年人(n = 102)通过电子方式完成了RM4 - FM、身体活动接受度问卷(PAAQ)和社会人口学特征问卷。在首次评估后一个月对RM4 - FM进行了重新施测。RM4 - FM很好地翻译成了芬兰语。动机维度得分倾向于高内部动机和低外部动机。在[具体维度]确认了地板效应,在[具体维度]确认了天花板效应。验证性因素分析表明四维模型不适用。用探索性因素分析对四个动机维度分别进行评估显示所有维度均为单维。探索性因素分析提供了一个最佳拟合的三因素模型(他人影响、幸福意图和动机的情感方面)。工具的重新施测显示在所有动机维度上具有良好的重测信度。女性、高等教育程度以及较高的PAAQ得分与较高的内部动机和较低的外部动机得分相关。芬兰语版的RM4 - FM工具在评估健康的芬兰老年成年人身体活动动机时提供了有效且可靠的分数。分数分布表明在评估内部动机时该量表存在不足。与原始版本相比,RM4 - FM的三因素模型提供了更有利的结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6421/8103190/b5b229a4d464/jer-17-2-103f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验