Suppr超能文献

单相和双相抑郁中报告的适应不良决策及其随治疗的变化。

Reported maladaptive decision-making in unipolar and bipolar depression and its change with treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2017 Nov;257:386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

Mood disorder patients frequently experience difficulty making decisions and may make sub-optimal decisions with adverse life consequences. However, patients' styles for decision-making when ill and after treatment have received little study to date. We assessed healthy controls (HC, n = 69) and patients with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 61) or bipolar disorder (BP, n = 26) in a current major depressive episode using the Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire. A subset of participants was re-evaluated after completing six weeks of pharmacotherapy. HC demonstrated significantly greater use of the healthy vigilance style, and significantly lower use of maladaptive decision-making styles, than the MDD and depressed BP patients. After six weeks of treatment, neither the MDD nor BP patients reported meaningful improvements in the vigilance style of decision-making, but scores on most maladaptive decision-making styles declined. BP patients who remitted reported significantly lower buckpassing and procrastination scores than healthy controls. Among MDD patients, however, the maladaptive passive buckpassing style of decision-making did not significantly diminish. For MDD patients, reported decision-making styles may remain impaired even after achieving remission. Among BP patients, low levels of adaptive vigilance decision-making may be a trait component of the illness, whereas for MDD patients, reported maladaptive passive decision-making styles are persistent.

摘要

心境障碍患者经常在决策时遇到困难,可能会做出不利于生活的次优决策。然而,迄今为止,针对患者患病和治疗后的决策风格的研究甚少。我们使用墨尔本决策问卷(Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire)评估了当前患有重度抑郁发作的健康对照组(HC,n = 69)和重性抑郁障碍(MDD,n = 61)或双相障碍(BP,n = 26)患者。部分参与者在完成六周药物治疗后接受了重新评估。与 MDD 和抑郁发作的 BP 患者相比,HC 表现出明显更高的健康警惕性风格的使用,以及明显更低的适应不良决策风格的使用。经过六周的治疗,MDD 或 BP 患者均未报告警觉性决策风格有明显改善,但大多数适应不良决策风格的评分有所下降。缓解的 BP 患者报告的推卸和拖延评分明显低于健康对照组。然而,对于 MDD 患者,适应性被动推卸的决策风格并没有明显减少。对于 MDD 患者,即使在达到缓解后,报告的决策风格可能仍然受损。对于 BP 患者,低水平的适应性警惕决策可能是疾病的特质成分,而对于 MDD 患者,报告的适应性被动决策风格是持续存在的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验