Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Nov;257:386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
Mood disorder patients frequently experience difficulty making decisions and may make sub-optimal decisions with adverse life consequences. However, patients' styles for decision-making when ill and after treatment have received little study to date. We assessed healthy controls (HC, n = 69) and patients with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 61) or bipolar disorder (BP, n = 26) in a current major depressive episode using the Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire. A subset of participants was re-evaluated after completing six weeks of pharmacotherapy. HC demonstrated significantly greater use of the healthy vigilance style, and significantly lower use of maladaptive decision-making styles, than the MDD and depressed BP patients. After six weeks of treatment, neither the MDD nor BP patients reported meaningful improvements in the vigilance style of decision-making, but scores on most maladaptive decision-making styles declined. BP patients who remitted reported significantly lower buckpassing and procrastination scores than healthy controls. Among MDD patients, however, the maladaptive passive buckpassing style of decision-making did not significantly diminish. For MDD patients, reported decision-making styles may remain impaired even after achieving remission. Among BP patients, low levels of adaptive vigilance decision-making may be a trait component of the illness, whereas for MDD patients, reported maladaptive passive decision-making styles are persistent.
心境障碍患者经常在决策时遇到困难,可能会做出不利于生活的次优决策。然而,迄今为止,针对患者患病和治疗后的决策风格的研究甚少。我们使用墨尔本决策问卷(Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire)评估了当前患有重度抑郁发作的健康对照组(HC,n = 69)和重性抑郁障碍(MDD,n = 61)或双相障碍(BP,n = 26)患者。部分参与者在完成六周药物治疗后接受了重新评估。与 MDD 和抑郁发作的 BP 患者相比,HC 表现出明显更高的健康警惕性风格的使用,以及明显更低的适应不良决策风格的使用。经过六周的治疗,MDD 或 BP 患者均未报告警觉性决策风格有明显改善,但大多数适应不良决策风格的评分有所下降。缓解的 BP 患者报告的推卸和拖延评分明显低于健康对照组。然而,对于 MDD 患者,适应性被动推卸的决策风格并没有明显减少。对于 MDD 患者,即使在达到缓解后,报告的决策风格可能仍然受损。对于 BP 患者,低水平的适应性警惕决策可能是疾病的特质成分,而对于 MDD 患者,报告的适应性被动决策风格是持续存在的。