Zhou Jiawei, Zhang Zheng, Li Sihong, Chen Hui, Chen Xianliang, Tang Huajia, Zhou Jiansong
Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96021-7.
Empirical research on the link between childhood maltreatment and coping styles in youths with depression remains scarce. This study explores the relationship between childhood maltreatment and coping styles in youths with major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar depression (BD). We recruited 277 youths with depression and 98 healthy controls (HC) using convenience sampling. Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the adapted Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA and Chi-square tests. The mediating roles of resilience and impulsivity between childhood maltreatment and coping style were analyzed with the PROCESS macro for SPSS. Among youths with depression, resilience and impulsivity were found to mediate the relationship between childhood maltreatment and coping style, with resilience accounting for 37.75% and impulsivity 17.72% of the total effect. Additionally, childhood maltreatment indirectly influenced coping style through resilience, which subsequently affected impulsivity, explaining 7.95% of the total effect. No direct effect of childhood maltreatment on coping style was observed in the BD group, and impulsivity did not mediate this relationship in the HC group. The study highlights that childhood maltreatment is directly related to coping styles in youths with depression and indirectly affects them through resilience and impulsivity. These findings suggest that improving resilience and managing impulsivity could enhance positive coping styles in this population.
关于童年期虐待与患有抑郁症的青少年应对方式之间联系的实证研究仍然匮乏。本研究探讨了患有重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相抑郁症(BD)的青少年中童年期虐待与应对方式之间的关系。我们采用便利抽样法招募了277名患有抑郁症的青少年和98名健康对照者(HC)。参与者完成了儿童创伤问卷简表(CTQ-SF)、康纳-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC)、中文版修订版巴拉特冲动性量表-11(BIS-11)以及简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)。使用方差分析和卡方检验评估组间差异。使用SPSS的PROCESS宏分析韧性和冲动性在童年期虐待与应对方式之间的中介作用。在患有抑郁症的青少年中,发现韧性和冲动性介导了童年期虐待与应对方式之间的关系,韧性占总效应的37.75%,冲动性占17.72%。此外,童年期虐待通过韧性间接影响应对方式,而韧性随后又影响冲动性,解释了总效应的7.95%。在BD组中未观察到童年期虐待对应对方式的直接影响,在HC组中冲动性未介导这种关系。该研究强调,童年期虐待与患有抑郁症的青少年的应对方式直接相关,并通过韧性和冲动性间接影响他们。这些发现表明,提高韧性和控制冲动性可以增强该人群的积极应对方式。