Chen Athena L, Goldfarb Ilona T, Scourtas Aristana O, Roberts Drucilla J
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.
Hum Pathol. 2017 Sep;67:187-197. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
There is considerable interest in using pathology to confirm acute abruptions. It has been suggested that pathologic findings can help to determine the timing of abruptions. Because of the dearth of evidence in the literature supporting this claim and its medicolegal implications, we undertook this study to explore further the possibility of timing abruptions by histopathology. We sought to correlate bleeding interval (duration from maternal presentation with vaginal bleeding [revealed abruption] to placental delivery) with placental histopathologic findings. We performed a retrospective review of clinical data and placental pathology from all cases of clinically diagnosed, acute, revealed abruptions at a single, large institution in New England between 2000 and 2015. Cases were identified based on clinical diagnoses, bleeding intervals were calculated from clinical notes, and histologic evaluations were performed by 2 pathologists blinded to the bleeding intervals. A total of 177 cases were analyzed. Of these, 103 (58%) had histologic findings corroborating the clinical diagnosis of abruption. The most frequent finding was maternal surface indentation (51 cases) followed by intravillous hemorrhage (50 cases). The former was also the earliest finding, with a minimum bleeding interval of 4 minutes. In multivariate modeling, plasma cell deciduitis was significantly associated with a longer bleeding interval (median 63 hours). If there were 2 pathologic findings, there was a trend toward a longer bleeding interval. There was modest sensitivity for the pathologic diagnosis of acute revealed abruption. Although there was not a clear, stepwise progression of histologic lesions; the presence of 2 or more findings tended to be seen with longer bleeding intervals. Our results suggest that histologic findings cannot be used to time acute revealed abruptions reliably, and any interpretation of such should be made with caution.
利用病理学来确诊急性胎盘早剥受到了广泛关注。有人提出病理结果有助于确定胎盘早剥的发生时间。鉴于文献中缺乏支持这一说法的证据及其法医学意义,我们开展了这项研究,以进一步探索通过组织病理学确定胎盘早剥发生时间的可能性。我们试图将出血间隔时间(从孕妇出现阴道出血[显性胎盘早剥]到胎盘娩出的持续时间)与胎盘组织病理学结果进行关联。我们对2000年至2015年期间在新英格兰一家大型机构临床诊断为急性显性胎盘早剥的所有病例的临床数据和胎盘病理学进行了回顾性分析。根据临床诊断确定病例,从临床记录中计算出血间隔时间,由2名对出血间隔时间不知情的病理学家进行组织学评估。共分析了177例病例。其中,103例(58%)的组织学结果证实了胎盘早剥的临床诊断。最常见的发现是母体面凹陷(51例),其次是绒毛内出血(50例)。前者也是最早出现的发现,最短出血间隔时间为4分钟。在多变量模型中,浆细胞蜕膜炎与较长的出血间隔时间显著相关(中位数为63小时)。如果有2项病理发现,则有出血间隔时间较长的趋势。急性显性胎盘早剥的病理诊断敏感性一般。虽然组织学病变没有明显的逐步进展;但出现2项或更多发现往往与较长的出血间隔时间相关。我们的结果表明,组织学结果不能可靠地用于确定急性显性胎盘早剥的发生时间,对此类结果的任何解读都应谨慎。