• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量灌注闪烁显像和 CT 肺动脉造影在妊娠合并肺栓塞中的应用价值。

Performance of Low-Dose Perfusion Scintigraphy and CT Pulmonary Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology & Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

出版信息

Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.005
PMID:28823756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The symptoms of normal pregnancy overlap those of pulmonary embolism (PE). Limited literature suggests that low-dose perfusion scanning (LDQ), which yields lower maternal-fetal radiation exposure than CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), performs well in excluding PE in pregnant patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of sequential pregnant women who underwent imaging for PE with LDQ or CTPA between 2008 and 2013 at Montefiore Medical Center. Our practice recommends LDQ for patients with negative results on chest radiographs. Patients were categorized according to initial imaging modality, and a subgroup analysis was performed in patients with asthma. The primary outcome was the negative predictive value (NPV) of imaging determined by VTE diagnosis within 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 322 pregnant women (mean age, 27.3 ± 6.3 years), initial imaging was positive for PE in 2.7% (6 of 225) of LDQs and 4.1% (4 of 97) of CTPAs, negative in 88.0% (198 of 225) of LDQs and 86.6% (84 of 97) of CTPAs, and indeterminate/nondiagnostic in 9.3% (21 of 225) of LDQs and 9.3% (9 of 97) of CTPAs (P = .79). Ten patients (3.1%) were treated for PE. The NPV was 100% for LDQ and 97.5% for CTPA. Subgroup analysis of patients with asthma (23.9% of this population) revealed a high likelihood of a negative study in the LDQ and CTPA groups (74.1% and 87.0%, respectively) and 100% NPV for both modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

PE is an uncommon diagnosis in pregnancy. LDQ and CTPA perform well, with less maternal-fetal radiation exposure with LDQ. Therefore, when available, LDQ is a reasonable first-choice modality for suspected PE in pregnant women with a negative result on chest radiograph.

摘要

背景

正常妊娠的症状与肺栓塞(PE)重叠。有限的文献表明,与 CT 肺动脉造影(CTPA)相比,低剂量灌注扫描(LDQ)在排除妊娠患者的 PE 方面表现良好,且前者可使母婴辐射暴露量更低。

方法

我们对 2008 年至 2013 年间在 Montefiore 医疗中心接受 LDQ 或 CTPA 成像检查以排除 PE 的连续妊娠患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们的常规做法是对胸片检查结果为阴性的患者推荐 LDQ。根据初始成像方式对患者进行分类,并对哮喘患者进行亚组分析。主要结局是通过 90 天内 VTE 诊断确定的影像学检查的阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

在 322 名孕妇(平均年龄 27.3 ± 6.3 岁)中,LDQ 检查结果为阳性的患者占 2.7%(225 例中的 6 例),CTPA 检查结果为阳性的患者占 4.1%(97 例中的 4 例),LDQ 检查结果为阴性的患者占 88.0%(225 例中的 198 例),CTPA 检查结果为阴性的患者占 86.6%(97 例中的 84 例),LDQ 检查结果为不确定/无法诊断的患者占 9.3%(225 例中的 21 例),CTPA 检查结果为不确定/无法诊断的患者占 9.3%(97 例中的 9 例)(P=.79)。10 名患者(3.1%)因 PE 接受了治疗。LDQ 的 NPV 为 100%,CTPA 的 NPV 为 97.5%。对哮喘患者(该人群中的 23.9%)的亚组分析显示,LDQ 和 CTPA 组的阴性研究可能性较大(分别为 74.1%和 87.0%),两种方法的 NPV 均为 100%。

结论

PE 在妊娠中是一种罕见的诊断。LDQ 和 CTPA 表现良好,且 LDQ 对母婴的辐射暴露量更低。因此,当 LDQ 可用时,对于胸片检查结果为阴性的疑似妊娠患者,LDQ 是一种合理的首选 PE 检查方法。

相似文献

1
Performance of Low-Dose Perfusion Scintigraphy and CT Pulmonary Angiography for Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.低剂量灌注闪烁显像和 CT 肺动脉造影在妊娠合并肺栓塞中的应用价值。
Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
Validating the safety of low-dose CTPA in pregnancy: results from the OPTICA (Optimised CT Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy) Study.验证低剂量 CTPA 在妊娠中的安全性:来自 OPTICA(妊娠优化 CT 肺动脉造影)研究的结果。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):4864-4873. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10593-y. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
The OPTICA study (Optimised Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy Quality and Safety study): Rationale and design of a prospective trial assessing the quality and safety of an optimised CTPA protocol in pregnancy.OPTICA 研究(妊娠期间优化 CT 肺动脉造影的质量和安全性研究):一项前瞻性试验的原理和设计,评估妊娠期间优化 CTPA 方案的质量和安全性。
Thromb Res. 2019 May;177:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Outcomes of Multidetector Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.多排螺旋 CT 肺动脉造影在疑似肺栓塞的妊娠和产后妇女中的应用结果。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):512-518. doi: 10.1177/0846537119899552. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Low yield of ventilation and perfusion imaging for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism after indeterminate CT pulmonary angiography.在CT肺动脉造影结果不确定后,通气灌注显像对肺栓塞评估的低阳性率。
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):525-530. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1503-9. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study.妊娠期肺栓塞:17 年单中心回顾性 MDCT 肺动脉造影研究。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1780-1789. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06501-4. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Perfusion scintigraphy versus 256-slice CT angiography in pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: comparison of radiation risks.灌注闪烁显像与 256 层 CT 血管造影在疑似肺栓塞孕妇中的应用:辐射风险比较。
J Nucl Med. 2014 Aug;55(8):1273-80. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.137968. Epub 2014 May 29.
8
Imaging for Pulmonary Embolism in Sickle Cell Disease: A 17-Year Experience.镰状细胞病肺栓塞的影像学表现:17 年经验
J Nucl Med. 2018 Aug;59(8):1255-1259. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.205641. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning.妊娠合并肺栓塞:CT 肺动脉造影与灌注扫描。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Sep;195(3):W214-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3506.
10
Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.妊娠期静脉血栓栓塞症的诊断
Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20160021. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160021. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
"Unraveling the Clot-Miscarriage Nexus: Mechanisms, Management, and Future Directions in Thrombosis-Related Recurrent Pregnancy Loss".解析血栓与流产的关联:血栓相关复发性流产的机制、管理及未来方向
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251339421. doi: 10.1177/10760296251339421. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Emergency imaging protocols for pregnant patients: a multi-institutional and multi- specialty comparison of physician education.孕妇的急诊影像检查方案:医师教育的多机构多专业比较
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Dec;31(6):851-866. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02284-4. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
3
Prevention, diagnosis, and management of PE and DVT in pregnant women.
妊娠期肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成的预防、诊断和治疗。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023 Dec 8;2023(1):237-247. doi: 10.1182/hematology.2023000476.
4
Bibliometric Analysis of Diagnostic Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE).CT肺血管造影(CTPA)在肺栓塞(PE)诊断中诊断收益的文献计量分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 16;15(7):e41979. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41979. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Venous Thromboembolism During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Risk Factors, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatment.妊娠期及产褥期静脉血栓栓塞症:危险因素、诊断性检查及治疗。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2022 Jul;77(7):433-444. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001043.
6
Pulmonary Embolism and Pregnancy-Challenges in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Decisions in High-Risk Patients.肺栓塞与妊娠——高危患者诊断和治疗决策中的挑战
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 8;9:856594. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856594. eCollection 2022.
7
Experience with a Perfusion-Only Screening Protocol for Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism During the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge.COVID-19 疫情高峰期间仅行灌注扫描方案评估肺栓塞的经验。
J Nucl Med. 2022 Apr;63(4):598-601. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262580. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
Safe Pulmonary Scintigraphy in the Era of COVID-19.COVID-19 时期的肺部安全闪烁显像。
Semin Nucl Med. 2022 Jan;52(1):48-55. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Breast dose matters.乳房剂量很重要。
Haematologica. 2021 Jun 1;106(6):1778. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.219584.
10
To everything there is a season: taxonomy of approaches to the performance of lung scintigraphy in the era of COVID-19.万物皆有时:新冠疫情时代肺部闪烁扫描检查方法的分类学
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Mar;48(3):666-669. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05100-6.