Suppr超能文献

评估自闭症谱系障碍成人及青少年的感觉统合失调:一项范围综述

Assessing Sensory Processing Dysfunction in Adults and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

DuBois Denise, Lymer Erin, Gibson Barbara E, Desarkar Pushpal, Nalder Emily

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.

Adult Neurodevelopmental Service, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2017 Aug 19;7(8):108. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7080108.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Sensory reactivity is a diagnostic criterion for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and has been associated with poorer functional outcomes, behavioral difficulties, and autism severity across the lifespan. Yet, there is little consensus on best practice approaches to assessing sensory processing dysfunction in adolescents and adults with ASD. Despite growing evidence that sensory symptoms persist into adolescence and adulthood, there is a lack of norms for older age groups, and pediatric assessments may not target appropriate functional outcomes or environments. This review identified approaches used to measure sensory processing in the scientific literature, and to describe and compare these approaches to current best practice guidelines that can be incorporated into evidence-based practice. Method and Analysis: A search of scientific databases and grey literature (professional association and ASD society websites), from January 1987-May 2017, uncovered 4769 articles and 12 clinical guidelines. Study and sample characteristics were extracted, charted, and categorized according to assessment approach.

RESULTS

There were 66 articles included after article screening. Five categories of assessment approaches were identified: Self- and Proxy-Report Questionnaires, Psychophysical Assessment, Direct Behavioral Observation, Qualitative Interview Techniques, and Neuroimaging/EEG. Sensory research to date has focused on individuals with high-functioning ASD, most commonly through the use of self-report questionnaires. The Adolescent and Adult Sensory Profile (AASP) is the most widely used assessment measure ( = 22), however, a number of other assessment approaches may demonstrate strengths specific to the ASD population. Multi-method approaches to assessment (e.g., combining psychophysical or observation with questionnaires) may have clinical applicability to interdisciplinary clinical teams serving adolescents and adults with ASD. Contribution: A comprehensive knowledge of approaches is critical in the clinical assessment of a population characterized by symptomatic heterogeneity and wide-ranging cognitive profiles. This review should inform future development of international interdisciplinary clinical guidelines on sensory processing assessment in ASD across the lifespan.

摘要

未标注

感觉反应性是孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)的一项诊断标准,并且在整个生命周期中都与较差的功能结局、行为困难以及孤独症严重程度相关。然而,对于评估患有ASD的青少年和成年人感觉加工功能障碍的最佳实践方法,目前几乎没有达成共识。尽管越来越多的证据表明感觉症状会持续到青少年期和成年期,但老年人群缺乏相关标准,并且儿科评估可能未针对适当的功能结局或环境。本综述确定了科学文献中用于测量感觉加工的方法,并将这些方法与当前可纳入循证实践的最佳实践指南进行描述和比较。方法与分析:检索1987年1月至2017年5月的科学数据库和灰色文献(专业协会及ASD协会网站),共找到4769篇文章和12项临床指南。根据评估方法提取、绘制并分类研究和样本特征。

结果

文章筛选后纳入66篇文章。确定了五类评估方法:自我和代理报告问卷、心理物理学评估、直接行为观察、定性访谈技术以及神经影像学/脑电图。迄今为止,感觉研究主要集中在高功能ASD个体,最常用的是自我报告问卷。青少年及成人感觉量表(AASP)是使用最广泛的评估工具(n = 22),然而,许多其他评估方法可能具有针对ASD人群的特定优势。多方法评估(例如,将心理物理学或观察与问卷相结合)可能对为患有ASD的青少年和成年人提供服务的跨学科临床团队具有临床适用性。贡献:对于一个具有症状异质性和广泛认知特征的人群,全面了解评估方法在临床评估中至关重要。本综述应为未来制定关于ASD全生命周期感觉加工评估的国际跨学科临床指南提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29c6/5575628/1b94d3573c2a/brainsci-07-00108-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验