在研究免疫检查点阻滞剂(PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂)的早期临床试验中,不应将基线淋巴细胞减少用作排除标准。
Baseline lymphopenia should not be used as exclusion criteria in early clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint blockers (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors).
作者信息
Sun Roger, Champiat Stéphane, Dercle Laurent, Aspeslagh Sandrine, Castanon Eduardo, Limkin Elaine Johanna, Baldini Capucine, Postel-Vinay Sophie, Hollebecque Antoine, Massard Christophe, Ammari Samy, Deutsch Eric, Soria Jean-Charles, Marabelle Aurélien, Ferté Charles
机构信息
Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94800 Villejuif, France.
出版信息
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Oct;84:202-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
INTRODUCTION
A number of phase I immunotherapy trials for cancer patients incorporate the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as an inclusion criteria. This study aims to assess whether ALC is associated with a lack of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in early clinical trials.
METHODS
All consecutive patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in phase I trials in our institution between December 2011 and January 2014 were reviewed. Baseline ALC, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Royal-Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR = SD + PR + CR, stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR)) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 were retrieved.
RESULTS
Out of a total of 167 patients, 48 (28.7%) and 8 patients (4.8%) had baseline ALCs of <1 G/l and <0.5 G/l, respectively. The RECIST change (%) was not correlated with ALC (G/l) (Spearman's rho = -0.06, P = 0.43). We did not observe any difference in terms of ORR (8.3% versus 15.1%, P = 0.32) or of DCR (58.3% versus 61.3%, P = 0.73) between patients with ALC <1 G/l versus >1 G/l. When using 0.5 G/l as ALC threshold, we did not find any difference either in ORR or in DCR. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, baseline ALC was not associated with overall survival, whereas the RMH and the number of previous lines of treatment remained independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Baseline ALC was not associated with response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in cancer patients enrolled in phase I trials. Patients should not be excluded from early phase clinical trials testing immune checkpoints blockers because of ALC.
引言
多项针对癌症患者的I期免疫治疗试验将绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)纳入纳入标准。本研究旨在评估在早期临床试验中,ALC是否与抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗反应缺失相关。
方法
回顾了2011年12月至2014年1月期间在我们机构进行的I期试验中接受抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗的所有连续患者。获取基线ALC、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、皇家马斯登医院(RMH)预后评分、客观缓解率(ORR)以及根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版定义的疾病控制率(DCR = 疾病稳定(SD)+部分缓解(PR)+完全缓解(CR))。
结果
在总共167例患者中(28.7%)有48例和(4.8%)有8例患者的基线ALC分别<1 G/l和<0.5 G/l。RECIST变化(%)与ALC(G/l)不相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数=-0.06,P = 0.43)。我们未观察到ALC<1 G/l与>1 G/l的患者在ORR方面(8.3%对15.1%,P = 0.32)或DCR方面(58.3%对61.3%,P = 0.73)有任何差异。当将0.5 G/l作为ALC阈值时,我们在ORR或DCR方面也未发现任何差异。在多因素Cox回归分析中,基线ALC与总生存期不相关,而RMH和既往治疗线数仍然是独立的预后因素。
结论
在参加I期试验的癌症患者中,基线ALC与抗PD-1/PD-L1治疗反应不相关。不应因ALC而将患者排除在检测免疫检查点阻滞剂的早期临床试验之外。