Center for Opto-Electronic Materials and Devices, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Hwarangno 14-gil 5, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea.
Department of Digital Media, Sangmyung University, Hongjimun 2-gil 20, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03016, Republic of Korea.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:7-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
Previous psychophysiological assessments of mental workload have relied on the addition of visual or auditory stimuli. This study investigated the tactile ERP and EEG spectral power correlates of mental workload by relating limited-capacity involuntary attention allocation to changes in late positive potential (LPP) amplitude, alpha, and theta powers. We examined whether mental workload (high-level cognitive control) can be evaluated using somatosensory stimuli. Sixteen participants all performed three tasks of varying difficulty. Two dual n-back tasks (n = 1 and 2) were used to investigate the degree to which mental workload affected the LPP amplitudes and EEG spectral powers evoked by ignoring salient tactile stimuli. In control trials, tactile vibrations were applied at random without dual n-back tasks. Subjective mental workload of each task was rated using the NASA Task Load Index. LPP amplitudes at Pz were significantly smaller in the dual-2-back trials compared to control and dual-1-back trials. Significantly increased theta power at Fz and reduced alpha power at Pz were found in the dual-2-back condition compared to control and dual-1-back condition. There was no significant difference between control and dual-1-back trials. The same pattern was found for subjective ratings of cognitive workload. These results indicate that the dual-2-back task imposed a significantly greater mental workload, causing impaired cognitive-control functions. Our findings support the notion that selective attention mechanisms necessary for effectively allocating and modulating attentional resources are temporarily impaired during the mentally overloaded state.
先前对精神工作负荷的心理生理评估依赖于添加视觉或听觉刺激。本研究通过将有限容量的非自愿注意力分配与晚正电位 (LPP) 幅度、α 和θ功率的变化相关联,研究了精神工作负荷的触觉 ERP 和 EEG 频谱功率相关性。我们研究了是否可以使用体感刺激来评估精神工作负荷(高级认知控制)。16 名参与者都执行了三种不同难度的任务。两个双 n 回任务(n = 1 和 2)用于研究精神工作负荷对忽略显着触觉刺激引起的 LPP 幅度和 EEG 频谱功率的影响程度。在对照试验中,触觉振动随机施加而没有双 n 回任务。使用 NASA 任务负荷指数对每项任务的主观精神工作负荷进行评分。与对照和双 1 回试验相比,双 2 回试验中 Pz 的 LPP 幅度显着减小。与对照和双 1 回条件相比,在双 2 回条件下发现 Fz 的θ功率显着增加,而 Pz 的α功率降低。在控制和双 1 回试验之间没有显着差异。认知工作负荷的主观评分也出现了相同的模式。这些结果表明,双 2 回任务施加了显着更大的精神工作负荷,导致认知控制功能受损。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即在精神负荷状态下,有效分配和调节注意力资源所需的选择性注意机制会暂时受到损害。