Suppr超能文献

日内指数变化如何影响牙周评估:一项初步研究。

How Intraday Index Changes Influence Periodontal Assessment: A Preliminary Study.

作者信息

Bertoldi Carlo, Forabosco Andrea, Lalla Michele, Generali Luigi, Zaffe Davide, Cortellini Pierpaolo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Department of Economics Marco Biagi, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2017;2017:7912158. doi: 10.1155/2017/7912158. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

Abstract

It is reputed that periodontal indices remain unchanged over a 24-hour period, with great clinical significance. This preliminary study analyzes daily index changes. In 56 selected patients, full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS), periodontal screening and recording (PSR) indices, and periodontal risk assessment (PRA) were recorded at baseline and three times per day (check-I: 08.30, check-II: 11.30, and check-III: 14.30), after appropriate cause-related therapy. Correlation between variables was statistically analyzed by Stata. All periodontal indices improved at the examination phase. Statistical differences were detected for FMPS comparing all thrice daily checks. Statistical differences were detected for FMBS and PRA comparing check-III with check-I and check-II. PSR showed no significant changes. The worst baseline indices produced the widest daily fluctuation at the examination phase. Significant variation of indices is directly related to clinical severity of periodontal conditions at baseline. Patients affected by severe periodontal disease may show significantly greater index changes. As indices are routinely recorded only once per day, the index daily variation has clinical significance. This greatly affects therapeutic strategy as correct periodontal assessment requires multiple evaluations at standardized times, particularly when baseline conditions are severe.

摘要

据认为,牙周指数在24小时内保持不变,具有重要的临床意义。这项初步研究分析了每日指数变化。在56名选定的患者中,在基线时以及在进行适当的病因相关治疗后,每天三次(检查I:08:30,检查II:11:30,检查III:14:30)记录全口菌斑评分(FMPS)、全口出血评分(FMBS)、牙周筛查与记录(PSR)指数以及牙周风险评估(PRA)。通过Stata对变量之间的相关性进行统计分析。在检查阶段,所有牙周指数均有所改善。比较每日三次检查的FMPS时发现有统计学差异。比较检查III与检查I和检查II的FMBS和PRA时发现有统计学差异。PSR未显示出显著变化。基线指数最差的在检查阶段每日波动最大。指数的显著变化与基线时牙周状况的临床严重程度直接相关。患有严重牙周病的患者可能显示出明显更大的指数变化。由于指数通常每天只记录一次,指数的每日变化具有临床意义。这对治疗策略有很大影响,因为正确的牙周评估需要在标准化时间进行多次评估,尤其是在基线情况严重时。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Regenerative periodontal therapy.再生性牙周治疗
Quintessence Int. 2014 Mar;45(3):185-92. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a31203.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验