Xu Bo, Zhou Dongxu, Ren Li, Shulman Steven, Zhang Xingan, Xiong Ming
Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, 510010, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441021, China.
J Anesth. 2017 Dec;31(6):813-820. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2399-y. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
This study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Morbidly obese (body mass index ≥40 kg/m) and normal weight patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery were included (n = 8, each group). After baseline hemodynamic measurement, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg was administered over 10 min. General anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 4 μg/kg 20 min after completion of dexmedetomidine infusion; the lungs were mechanically ventilated after tracheal intubation. The pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine was analyzed by a noncompartment model. Hemodynamic data and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO) were measured up to 30 min after starting dexmedetomidine infusion. Sedation level was measured with the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale.
Peak plasma concentration, area under the curve to infinity, elimination half-life, and apparent volume of distribution were significantly larger in morbidly obese than in normal weight patients (3.75 ± 0.56 vs. 2.54 ± 0.32 µg/l, P < 0.001; 2174 ± 335 vs. 1594 ± 251 ng h/l, P < 0.001; 225 ± 55 vs. 158 ± 53 min, P = 0.02; 310 ± 63 vs. 164 ± 41 l, P < 0.001, respectively). Although clearance was also higher in obese patients than in normal body weight patients (58.6 ± 10.7 vs. 44.9 ± 9.0 l/h, P = 0.02), it was lower in obese patients than in normal body weight patients after normalization to total body weight (0.47 ± 0.07 vs. 0.64 ± 0.09 l/h/kg, P < 0.001). There were no differences in systolic or diastolic blood pressure or heart rate between the two groups within the 30 min. Sedation level was deeper and SpO was lower in morbidly obese than in normal weight patients. More patients in the morbidly obese patient group experienced deeper sedation after the start of the dexmedetomidine infusion (P < 0.05).
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine are significantly different in morbidly obese patients compared with normal weight patients. Level of sedation was significantly deeper, and oxygen saturation was significantly lower, in morbidly obese than in normal weight patients, probably resulting from higher plasma concentration after infusion of 1.0 µg/kg.
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER, REGISTRY URL: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01864187), https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts=1&cx=-jg9qo4 .
本研究旨在调查右美托咪定在接受腹腔镜手术的病态肥胖患者中的药代动力学和药效学。
纳入计划进行择期腹腔镜手术的病态肥胖(体重指数≥40 kg/m²)和正常体重患者(每组n = 8)。在进行基线血流动力学测量后,在10分钟内给予右美托咪定1μg/kg。在右美托咪定输注完成20分钟后,用丙泊酚1.5mg/kg和芬太尼4μg/kg诱导全身麻醉;气管插管后进行机械通气。采用非房室模型分析右美托咪定的药代动力学。在开始输注右美托咪定后30分钟内测量血流动力学数据和外周血氧饱和度(SpO₂)。用观察者警觉/镇静评估(OAA/S)量表测量镇静水平。
病态肥胖患者的血浆峰浓度、曲线下面积至无穷大、消除半衰期和表观分布容积显著大于正常体重患者(3.75±0.56 vs. 2.54±0.32μg/l,P < 0.001;2174±335 vs. 1594±251 ng·h/l,P < 0.001;225±55 vs. 158±53分钟,P = 0.02;310±63 vs. 164±41 l,P < 0.001)。虽然肥胖患者的清除率也高于正常体重患者(58.6±10.7 vs. 44.9±9.0 l/h,P = 0.02),但按总体重归一化后,肥胖患者的清除率低于正常体重患者(0.47±0.07 vs. 0.64±0.09 l/h/kg,P < 0.001)。两组在30分钟内的收缩压、舒张压或心率无差异。病态肥胖患者的镇静水平比正常体重患者更深,SpO₂更低。病态肥胖患者组中更多患者在开始输注右美托咪定后出现更深的镇静(P < 0.05)。
与正常体重患者相比,病态肥胖患者中右美托咪定的药代动力学和药效学有显著差异。病态肥胖患者的镇静水平显著更深,血氧饱和度显著更低,这可能是由于输注1.0μg/kg后血浆浓度更高所致。
临床试验编号、注册网址:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01864187),https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts=1&cx=-jg9qo4 。