McCallum Gabrielle B, Plumb Erin J, Morris Peter S, Chang Anne B
Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, 0810.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD009834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009834.pub3.
Bronchiolitis is a common acute respiratory condition with high prevalence worldwide. This clinically diagnosed syndrome is manifested by tachypnoea (rapid breathing), with crackles or wheeze in young children. In the acute phase of bronchiolitis (≤ 14 days), antibiotics are not routinely prescribed unless the illness is severe or a secondary bacterial infection is suspected. Although bronchiolitis is usually self-limiting, some young children continue to have protracted symptoms (e.g. cough and wheezing) beyond the acute phase and often re-present to secondary care.
To compare the effectiveness of antibiotics versus controls (placebo or no treatment) for reducing or treating persistent respiratory symptoms following acute bronchiolitis within six months of acute illness.
We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), the World Health Organization (WHO) trial portal, the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov, up to 26 August 2016.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus controls (placebo or no treatment) given in the post-acute phase of bronchiolitis (> 14 days) for children younger than two years with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis.
Two review authors independently assessed studies against predefined criteria, and selected, extracted, and assessed data for inclusion. We contacted trial authors for further information.
In this review update, we added one study with 219 children. A total of two RCTs with 249 children (n = 240 completed) were eligible for inclusion in this review. Both studies contributed to our primary and secondary outcomes, but we assessed the quality of evidence for our three primary outcomes as low, owing to the small numbers of studies and participants; and high attrition in one of the studies. Data show no significant differences between treatment groups for our primary outcomes: proportion of children (n = 249) who had persistent symptoms at follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 1.28; fixed-effect model); and number of children (n = 240) rehospitalised with respiratory illness within six months (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.05 to 6.21; random-effects model). We were unable to analyse exacerbation rate because studies used different methods to report this information. Data showed no significant differences between treatment groups for our secondary outcome: proportion of children (n = 240) with wheeze at six months (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.95; random-effects model). One study reported bacterial resistance, but only at 48 hours (thus with limited applicability for this review). Another study reported adverse events from which all children recovered and remained in the study.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to inform whether antibiotics should be used to treat or prevent persistent respiratory symptoms in the post-acute bronchiolitis phase. Future RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotics for reducing persistent respiratory symptoms. This is particularly important in populations with high acute and post-acute bronchiolitis morbidity (e.g. indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, and the USA).
细支气管炎是一种常见的急性呼吸道疾病,在全球范围内发病率很高。这种临床诊断的综合征表现为呼吸急促(呼吸加快),幼儿伴有湿啰音或哮鸣音。在细支气管炎急性期(≤14天),除非病情严重或怀疑有继发性细菌感染,否则通常不常规使用抗生素。尽管细支气管炎通常是自限性的,但一些幼儿在急性期过后仍会持续出现症状(如咳嗽和哮鸣),并经常再次到二级医疗机构就诊。
比较抗生素与对照组(安慰剂或不治疗)在急性疾病6个月内减轻或治疗急性细支气管炎后持续呼吸道症状的有效性。
我们检索了以下数据库:Cochrane气道试验组注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase(Ovid)、世界卫生组织(WHO)试验平台、澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册库以及ClinicalTrials.gov,截至2016年8月26日。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),比较在细支气管炎急性期后(>14天)给予诊断为细支气管炎的2岁以下儿童抗生素与对照组(安慰剂或不治疗)的效果。
两位综述作者根据预定义标准独立评估研究,并选择、提取和评估纳入数据。我们联系试验作者获取更多信息。
在本次综述更新中,我们增加了一项有219名儿童的研究。共有两项包含249名儿童(n = 240名完成研究)的RCT符合纳入本综述的标准。两项研究均对我们的主要和次要结局有贡献,但由于研究和参与者数量较少,以及其中一项研究的高失访率,我们将三个主要结局的证据质量评估为低。数据显示,治疗组在主要结局方面无显著差异:随访时仍有持续症状的儿童比例(n = 249)(比值比(OR)0.69,95%置信区间(CI)0.37至1.28;固定效应模型);以及6个月内因呼吸道疾病再次住院的儿童数量(n = 240)(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.05至6.21;随机效应模型)。由于研究报告该信息的方法不同,我们无法分析病情加重率。数据显示,治疗组在次要结局方面无显著差异:6个月时有哮鸣的儿童比例(n = 240)(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.06至3.95;随机效应模型)。一项研究报告了细菌耐药性,但仅在48小时时(因此对本综述的适用性有限)。另一项研究报告了不良事件,所有儿童均康复并留在研究中。
目前的证据不足以说明是否应使用抗生素治疗或预防细支气管炎急性期后持续的呼吸道症状。需要未来的随机对照试验来评估抗生素减轻持续呼吸道症状的疗效。这在急性和急性期后细支气管炎发病率高的人群(如澳大利亚、新西兰和美国的原住民)中尤为重要。