Suppr超能文献

长期护理中的矛盾现象——疏散期间就地避难:长期护理机构疏散与就地避难最佳实践的文献综述

An oxymoron of long-term care-Sheltering-in-place during an evacuation: A literature review of the best practices of evacuation and sheltering-in-place for long-term care facilities.

作者信息

Baxter Megan

机构信息

Liberal Arts and Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Emerg Manag. 2017 May/Jun;15(3):195-201. doi: 10.5055/jem.2017.0328.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are defined as residential facilities that are home to elderly patrons who are no longer able to live independently. These facilities require comprehensive emergency planning to provide the best response to the threat of a disaster for their residents. However, LTCFs are often overlooked in disaster planning, leaving them to work independently to create suitable arrangements in the event of a disaster. This article examines the literature on evacuating and compares it to the literature on sheltering-in-place for LTCFs. Conclusions regarding best practices are also provided.

METHODS

A literature review and Internet search were completed in July 2016. Information was entered onto a spreadsheet listing the key points of each article, which was reviewed for emerging themes.

RESULTS

Out of the 399 acquired articles and grey literature found during the research portion of this article, 30 were deemed pertinent, 22 of which appear in this article. All included articles were peer reviewed. Themes emerging from these articles include the persistent absence of research into the best practices for LTCFs during emergencies and the difficulties of evacuating and sheltering-in-place with frail populations.

CONCLUSION

While there is no one right answer for all scenarios, sheltering-in-place appears to be the default safe option for those in LTCFs-with the assumption that the facility has taken steps toward preparation, such as purchasing generators and securing enough food, water, and medical supplies to sustain the residents, staff, and families of both for 7 days. Additionally, a LTCF needs to devise contingency plans for evacuation if necessary, to be fully prepared for a catastrophic event.

摘要

背景

长期护理机构(LTCFs)被定义为居住设施,是不再能够独立生活的老年顾客的住所。这些设施需要全面的应急计划,以便对其居民面临的灾难威胁做出最佳应对。然而,长期护理机构在灾难规划中常常被忽视,导致它们只能自行努力,以便在灾难发生时做出适当安排。本文研究了有关疏散的文献,并将其与长期护理机构就地避难的文献进行了比较。同时还给出了关于最佳做法的结论。

方法

2016年7月完成了文献综述和互联网搜索。信息被录入一个电子表格,列出每篇文章的要点,并对其进行审查以找出新出现的主题。

结果

在本文研究阶段获取的399篇文章和灰色文献中,30篇被认为相关,其中22篇出现在本文中。所有纳入的文章均经过同行评审。这些文章中出现的主题包括,在紧急情况下,长期护理机构最佳做法的研究一直缺失,以及疏散体弱人群和让他们就地避难存在困难。

结论

虽然对于所有情况没有一个正确答案,但就地避难似乎是长期护理机构人员默认的安全选择——前提是该机构已采取了一些准备措施,如购买发电机,并确保储备足够的食物、水和医疗用品,以维持居民、工作人员及其家属7天的生活。此外,长期护理机构需要制定必要时的疏散应急计划,为灾难性事件做好充分准备。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验