Suppr超能文献

言语推理与执行策略功能评估(FAVRES)的结构效度。

Construct validity of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES).

作者信息

Higginson Christopher I, Thompson Tom, Benjamin Abigail E, Rosales Allison C, Zane Katherine L, Valenti Marisa, Ibrahim Karlie, Rock Megan A, Chaffee Trisha A

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Loyola University Maryland , Baltimore , MD , USA.

b Loyola Clinical Centers , Loyola University Maryland , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2017;31(13-14):1807-1812. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1347278. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES) is a measure of cognitive-communication and executive functions involving everyday tasks. Scores are predictive of employment status; however, the measure's construct validity is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The study's objective was to assess the linear association of FAVRES test performance with performance on a number of neuropsychological measures in a sample of individuals with neurocognitive deficits.

METHODS

Twenty-two adults completed the FAVRES, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS), Color-Word Interference (CWI), Tower and Trail Making (TM).

RESULTS

FAVRES Total Accuracy score significantly correlated with CWI Inhibition (r = -0.43) and Tower (r = 0.60). Total Rationale significantly correlated with CWI Inhibition (r = -0.49), TM Number-Letter Switching (r = -0.48) and Tower (r = 0.55). Total Reasoning significantly correlated with CWI Inhibition (r = -0.71), Inhibition Switching (r = -0.50), TM Number-Letter Switching (r = -0.67) and Tower (r = 0.69) but also correlated with a number of measures involving other elements of cognition.

CONCLUSION

Results provide evidence of convergent validity for the FAVRES as a measure of executive functions. Accuracy and Rationale scores also appear to have good discriminant validity.

摘要

背景

言语推理与执行策略功能评估(FAVRES)是一种涉及日常任务的认知沟通和执行功能测量方法。分数可预测就业状况;然而,该测量方法的结构效度尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是评估在有神经认知缺陷的个体样本中,FAVRES测试表现与多项神经心理学测量表现之间的线性关联。

方法

22名成年人完成了FAVRES、神经心理状态评估可重复成套测验(RBANS)、德利斯科-卡普兰执行功能系统(D-KEFS)、颜色-文字干扰(CWI)、塔与连线测验(TM)。

结果

FAVRES总准确率得分与CWI抑制(r = -0.43)和塔测验(r = 0.60)显著相关。总理由得分与CWI抑制(r = -0.49)、TM数字-字母转换(r = -0.48)和塔测验(r = 0.55)显著相关。总推理得分与CWI抑制(r = -0.71)、抑制转换(r = -0.50)、TM数字-字母转换(r = -0.67)和塔测验(r = 0.69)显著相关,但也与涉及其他认知要素的多项测量相关。

结论

结果为FAVRES作为执行功能测量方法的收敛效度提供了证据。准确率和理由得分似乎也具有良好的区分效度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验