Alkhorayef M, Sulieman A, Babikir E, Daar E, Alnaaimi M, Alduaij M, Bradley D
Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P. O.Box 10219, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia; Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH,UK.
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Appl Radiat Isot. 2018 Aug;138:14-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
A pacemaker, which is used for heart resynchronization with electrical impulses, is used to manage many clinical conditions. Recently, the frequency of pacemaker implantation procedures has increased to more than 50% worldwide. During this procedure, patients can be exposed to excessive radiation exposure. Wide range of doses has been reported in previous studies, suggesting that optimization of this procedure has not been fulfilled yet. The current study evaluated patient radiation exposure during cardiac pacemaker procedures and quantified the patient effective dose. A total of 145 procedures were performed for five pacemaker procedures (VVI, VVIR, VVD, VVDR, and DDDR) at two hospitals. Patient doses were measured using the kerma-area product meter. Effective doses were estimated using software based on Monte Carlo simulation from the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB, now The Health Protection Agency). The effective dose values were used to estimate cancer risk from the pacemaker procedure. Patient demographic data and exposure parameters for fluoroscopy and radiography were quantified. The mean patient doses ± SD per procedure (Gycm) for VVI, VVIR, VVD, VVDR, and DDDR were 1.52 ± 0.13 (1.43-1.61), 3.28 ± 2.34 (0.29-8.73), 3.04 ± 1.67 (1.57-4.86), 6.04 ± 2.326 3.29-8.58), and 8.8 ± 3.6 (4.5-26.20), respectively. The overall patient effective dose was 1.1mSv per procedure. It is obvious that the DDDR procedure exposed patients to the highest radiation dose. Patient dose variation can be attributed to procedure type, exposure parameter settings, and fluoroscopy time. The results of this study showed that patient doses during different pacemaker procedures are lower compared to previous reported values. Patient risk from pacemaker procedure is low, compared to other cardiac interventional procedures. Patients' exposures were mainly influenced by the type of procedures and the clinical indication.
用于通过电脉冲实现心脏再同步的起搏器,可用于治疗多种临床病症。最近,起搏器植入手术的频率在全球范围内已增至50%以上。在此手术过程中,患者可能会受到过量辐射照射。先前的研究报告了广泛的剂量范围,这表明该手术的优化尚未实现。当前研究评估了心脏起搏器手术期间患者的辐射暴露情况,并对患者的有效剂量进行了量化。在两家医院针对五种起搏器手术(VVI、VVIR、VVD、VVDR和DDDR)共进行了145例手术。使用比释动能面积乘积仪测量患者剂量。基于国家放射防护委员会(NRPB,现为健康保护局)的蒙特卡罗模拟软件估算有效剂量。有效剂量值用于估算起搏器手术导致的癌症风险。对患者人口统计学数据以及透视和X线摄影的暴露参数进行了量化。VVI、VVIR、VVD、VVDR和DDDR每种手术的平均患者剂量±标准差(Gycm)分别为1.52±0.13(1.43 - 1.61)、3.28±2.34(0.29 - 8.73)、3.04±1.67(1.57 - 4.86)、6.04±2.32(3.29 - 8.58)和8.8±3.6(4.5 - 26.20)。每次手术的总体患者有效剂量为1.1mSv。显然,DDDR手术使患者受到的辐射剂量最高。患者剂量变化可归因于手术类型、暴露参数设置和透视时间。本研究结果表明,与先前报告的值相比,不同起搏器手术期间的患者剂量较低。与其他心脏介入手术相比,起搏器手术导致患者的风险较低。患者的暴露主要受手术类型和临床指征的影响。