Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Students' Research Center, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Neurol. 2017 Sep;264(9):2003-2009. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8590-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) often follows a relapsing course. As disability in NMOSD is attack-related, effective treatments are needed. We aimed to compare the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) and rituximab (RIT) as maintenance therapy in NMOSD patients. An open, randomized clinical trial was conducted during September 2015 to December 2016, in Isfahan, Iran. Initially, 100 NMOSD patients were approached, 86 entered the study, and 68 cases completed the trial. All patients had a relapsing-remitting course with expanded disability extended scale (EDSS) ≤7 (median 2.75, range = 0-7). Patients were randomized into two groups, which did not differ according to age, gender distribution, and disease duration. In the AZA group, 35 patients [20 aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG positive] were started on 50 mg/day oral AZA and increased to 2-3 mg/kg/day (with oral prednisolone as adjunctive therapy). In the RIT group, 33 patients (13 aquaporin-4-IgG positive) received 1 g intravenous rituximab and repeated 2 weeks later and then every 6 months. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was measured as the primary outcome and EDSS as the secondary outcome after 12 months of intervention. The mean ARR [standard deviation (SD)] in the AZA group decreased from 1 (0.38) to 0.51 (0.55) (P value <0.001) and in the RIT group decreased from 1.30 (0.68) to 0.21 (0.42) (P value <0.001). ARR after intervention minus ARR before intervention [mean (SD)] was 1.09 (0.72) in RIT group and 0.49 (0.59) in AZA group (P value <0.001). EDSS after intervention minus EDSS before intervention [mean (SD)] was 0.98 (1.14) in RIT group and 0.44 (0.54) in AZA group (P value <0.001). Nineteen patients (54.3%) in AZA group and 26 patients (78.8%) in RIT group became relapse-free after intervention (P value = 0.033). AZA and RIT can both effectively decrease ARR and EDSS in NMOSD patients. RIT was significantly more effective than AZA treatment. Trial Registration Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov; ID: NCT03002038; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03002038 .
视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病(NMOSD)常呈复发病程。由于 NMOSD 的残疾与发作相关,因此需要有效的治疗。我们旨在比较硫唑嘌呤(AZA)和利妥昔单抗(RIT)作为 NMOSD 患者维持治疗的疗效。一项开放、随机临床试验于 2015 年 9 月至 2016 年 12 月在伊朗伊斯法罕进行。最初,有 100 名 NMOSD 患者被纳入研究,其中 86 名患者入组,68 名患者完成了试验。所有患者均为复发缓解型病程,扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)≤7(中位数 2.75,范围 0-7)。患者随机分为两组,两组在年龄、性别分布和疾病持续时间方面无差异。在 AZA 组,35 名患者(20 名水通道蛋白 4 [AQP4]-IgG 阳性)开始口服 50mg/天 AZA,并逐渐增加至 2-3mg/kg/天(同时口服泼尼松龙作为辅助治疗)。在 RIT 组,33 名患者(13 名 AQP4-IgG 阳性)接受 1g 静脉注射利妥昔单抗,2 周后重复使用,然后每 6 个月使用一次。12 个月干预后的年复发率(ARR)为主要结局,EDSS 为次要结局。AZA 组的平均 ARR[标准差(SD)]从 1(0.38)降至 0.51(0.55)(P 值<0.001),RIT 组从 1.30(0.68)降至 0.21(0.42)(P 值<0.001)。干预后 ARR 减去干预前 ARR[均值(SD)]在 RIT 组为 1.09(0.72),在 AZA 组为 0.49(0.59)(P 值<0.001)。干预后 EDSS 减去干预前 EDSS[均值(SD)]在 RIT 组为 0.98(1.14),在 AZA 组为 0.44(0.54)(P 值<0.001)。干预后,AZA 组有 19 名患者(54.3%)和 RIT 组有 26 名患者(78.8%)无复发(P 值=0.033)。AZA 和 RIT 均可有效降低 NMOSD 患者的 ARR 和 EDSS。RIT 治疗明显优于 AZA 治疗。
试验注册 注册名称:clinicaltrials.gov;ID:NCT03002038;网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03002038。