Kokotovic Dunja, Burcharth Jakob, Helgstrand Frederik, Gögenur Ismail
Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital and Copenhagen University, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Nov;402(7):1023-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1618-1. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
All surgical procedures elicit a complex systemic inflammatory response effectuated and modulated by cytokines. The purpose of this systematic review was to present an overview of the inflammatory response and the serum markers associated with hernia repair and to compare the response between patients treated with and without mesh.
The review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines. The outcomes of interest were serum concentration of leukocytes, cytokines, and acute phase proteins before and after hernia repair with or without mesh reinforcement. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies of intervention.
A total of 31 studies were included in the systematic review including 1326 patients with a mean age ranging from 33 to 67 years. The studies predominantly included males (95.0% males, 5.0% female) with inguinal hernias (98.5% inguinal hernias, 1.5% incisional hernias). The inflammatory response after hernia repair was characterized by an increase in CRP, IL-6, leukocytes, neutrophils, IL-1, IL-10, fibrinogen, and α1-antitrypsin and a decrease in lymphocytes and albumin within the first 24 postoperative hours. The systemic inflammatory response was normalized before or on the seventh postoperative day. A higher CRP and IL-6 serum concentration was found in patients treated with mesh compared with sutured repairs.
Hernia repair elicits a systemic inflammatory response characterized by an increase in CRP, IL-6, leukocytes, neutrophils, IL-1, IL-10, fibrinogen, and α1-antitrypsin and a decrease in lymphocytes and albumin. A higher inflammatory response was found after mesh repair compared with non-mesh repair and after open mesh repair compared with laparoscopic mesh repair.
所有外科手术都会引发由细胞因子介导和调节的复杂全身炎症反应。本系统评价的目的是概述与疝修补相关的炎症反应及血清标志物,并比较使用补片和未使用补片治疗的患者之间的反应。
本评价按照PRISMA指南进行。感兴趣的结局是疝修补术使用或不使用补片加强前后白细胞、细胞因子和急性期蛋白的血清浓度。使用Cochrane ROBINS-I工具对干预性非随机研究进行偏倚风险评估。
系统评价共纳入31项研究,包括1326例患者,平均年龄33至67岁。这些研究主要纳入男性(95.0%为男性,5.0%为女性)腹股沟疝患者(98.5%为腹股沟疝,1.5%为切口疝)。疝修补术后的炎症反应特征为术后24小时内CRP、IL-6、白细胞、中性粒细胞、IL-1、IL-10、纤维蛋白原和α1-抗胰蛋白酶增加,淋巴细胞和白蛋白减少。全身炎症反应在术后第七天或之前恢复正常。与缝合修补相比,使用补片治疗的患者CRP和IL-6血清浓度更高。
疝修补引发全身炎症反应,其特征为CRP、IL-6、白细胞、中性粒细胞、IL-1、IL-10、纤维蛋白原和α1-抗胰蛋白酶增加,淋巴细胞和白蛋白减少。与非补片修补相比,补片修补后炎症反应更高;与腹腔镜补片修补相比,开放补片修补后炎症反应更高。