系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目（PRISMA-P）2015声明。
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
作者信息
Moher David, Shamseer Larissa, Clarke Mike, Ghersi Davina, Liberati Alessandro, Petticrew Mark, Shekelle Paul, Stewart Lesley A
机构信息
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
出版信息
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
系统评价应以描述评价的基本原理、假设和计划方法的方案为基础；很少有评价报告是否存在这样一个方案。详细、描述充分的方案有助于理解和评估评价方法，以及在完成的评价中发现方法的修改和选择性报告。我们描述了一份报告指南《系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目2015》（PRISMA-P 2015）的制定。PRISMA-P由一份17项清单组成，旨在促进为系统评价制定和报告一份完善的方案。资助者和委托进行评价的机构可能会考虑强制使用该清单，以便在资助申请中提交相关的方案信息。同样，同行评审人员和编辑可以利用该指南来评估提交给期刊或其他媒介发表的系统评价方案的完整性和透明度。
Zotero 插件