Saletu B, Grünberger J, Linzmayer L
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1986 Apr;1(2):145-64. doi: 10.1097/00004850-198604000-00006.
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of a new imidazo-pyridine derivative, alpidem (SL80.0342) and the 1,4 benzodiazepine lorazepam were investigated utilizing quantitative EEG and psychometric testing. Ten normal volunteers received randomized (latin square) single oral doses of placebo, 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg alpidem and 2.5 mg lorazepam at weekly intervals. Blood level sampling, EEG recordings, evaluation of pulse, blood pressure and side-effects were carried out at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post drug; psychometric and psychophysiological investigations at the same time periods except for the first hour. Computer-assisted spectral-analysis of the EEG demonstrated an anxiolytic profile after both compounds, characterized by an increase of beta activity, decrease of alpha activity and acceleration of the centroid of the total activity and total beta activity. Total power was attenuated, delta activity augmented and the centroid of the combined delta and theta activities decreased. The latter changes were most pronounced after 2.5 mg lorazepam suggesting it is more sedative than alpidem. Dose/treatment efficacy calculations revealed 2.5 mg lorazepam as the most CNS-active compound, followed by 100 mg, 50 mg and 25 mg alpidem. Based on a multivariate analysis 2.5 mg lorazepam could be differentiated from placebo at all times, 100 mg alpidem in the first, second and fourth hours, 50 mg only in the second hour. Time-efficacy calculations showed a marked CNS effect after alpidem in the first hour with a peak in the second hour, a gentle decline to the fourth hour and thereafter a rapid decline up to the eighth hour. In contrast, 2.5 mg lorazepam showed a slower rise in CNS activity which peaked in the fourth hour and declined slowly thereafter. These pharmacodynamic effects paralleled the blood level course of both compounds, as well as the time-course of psychometric changes. The latter were characterized by a deterioration in psychometer function after 2.5 mg lorazepam, which was less pronounced after 100 mg alpidem, while 50 mg and 25 mg showed no significant difference from placebo. Subjective ratings of mood showed a decrement which was most pronounced after 100 mg alpidem, less so after 50 mg, with no difference from placebo after 25 mg or lorazepam. Finally, there were no significant inter-drug differences with regard to psychophysiological variables.
在一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,利用定量脑电图和心理测量测试,对一种新的咪唑并吡啶衍生物阿吡坦(SL80.0342)和1,4 - 苯二氮䓬类药物劳拉西泮的药代动力学和药效学作用进行了研究。10名正常志愿者按随机(拉丁方)方式,每周一次口服给予安慰剂、25毫克、50毫克和100毫克阿吡坦以及2.5毫克劳拉西泮单剂量。在给药后0、1、2、4、6和8小时进行血药浓度采样、脑电图记录、脉搏、血压和副作用评估;除第一小时外,在相同时间段进行心理测量和心理生理学研究。脑电图的计算机辅助频谱分析显示,两种化合物给药后均呈现抗焦虑特征,表现为β活动增加、α活动减少以及总活动和总β活动质心加速。总功率减弱,δ活动增强,δ和θ活动合并质心下降。2.5毫克劳拉西泮给药后这些变化最为明显,表明其比阿吡坦更具镇静作用。剂量/治疗效果计算显示,2.5毫克劳拉西泮是中枢神经系统活性最强的化合物,其次是100毫克、50毫克和25毫克阿吡坦。基于多变量分析,2.5毫克劳拉西泮在所有时间均可与安慰剂区分开,100毫克阿吡坦在第一、第二和第四小时可区分,50毫克仅在第二小时可区分。时间 - 效果计算显示,阿吡坦给药后第一小时有明显的中枢神经系统效应,第二小时达到峰值,第四小时平缓下降,此后直至第八小时迅速下降。相比之下,2.5毫克劳拉西泮中枢神经系统活性上升较慢,在第四小时达到峰值,此后缓慢下降。这些药效学作用与两种化合物的血药浓度变化过程以及心理测量变化的时间过程平行。心理测量变化的特征是,2.5毫克劳拉西泮给药后心理测量功能恶化,100毫克阿吡坦给药后不太明显,而50毫克和25毫克与安慰剂无显著差异。情绪的主观评分显示有下降,100毫克阿吡坦给药后最明显,50毫克给药后次之,25毫克或劳拉西泮给药后与安慰剂无差异。最后,在心理生理学变量方面,药物之间没有显著差异。