Aljuri Nikolai, Gilling Peter, Roehrborn Claus
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation, Redwood Shores, California, USA.
Can J Urol. 2017 Aug;24(4):8937-8940.
Since its first report in the 1870s, control of bleeding after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has remained a concern. Foley's initial report of a urinary catheter involved placement of the balloon into the prostatic fossa following TURP. Removal of prostate tissue with a high-velocity saline stream (Aquablation) is a recently reported alternative to TURP. As Aquablation is heat-free, alternatives to non-thermal hemostasis were sought to optimize the procedure. We report use of a balloon catheter in the prostatic fossa after Aquablation as a post-resection hemostatic method.
自19世纪70年代首次报道以来,经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)后的出血控制一直备受关注。 Foley最初关于导尿管的报告涉及TURP后将球囊放置在前列腺窝内。用高速盐水流切除前列腺组织(水消融术)是最近报道的一种替代TURP的方法。由于水消融术无热效应,因此寻求非热止血的替代方法以优化该手术。我们报告了在水消融术后将球囊导管用于前列腺窝作为切除后止血方法的情况。