• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物利用研究中不同召回期之间的一致性。

Agreement between different recall periods in drug utilization studies.

作者信息

Moraes Cassia Garcia, Mengue Sotero Serrate, Pizzol Tatiane da Silva Dal

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

Department of Production and Control of Medications, School of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):324-334. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201700020012.

DOI:10.1590/1980-5497201700020012
PMID:28832854
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

: To assess the agreement between three recall periods for self-reported drug use using a 24-hour recall period as reference.

METHODS

: Participants were allocated into three groups with different recall periods of 7, 14 and 30 days and were interviewed at two different times. A 24-hour recall questionnaire was answered during the first interview, and a questionnaire on drug use over the different recall periods tested was answered during the second interview. The agreement between the questionnaires was evaluated using percent agreement and kappa.

RESULTS

: For continuous drugs, percent agreement varied between 92 and 99% and kappa varied between 0.71 and 0.97 for three periods tested. For drugs of occasional use, percent agreement varied between 63 and 81% and kappa varied between 0.27 and 0.52. The prevalence of drugs, particularly those of occasional use, increases with time.

CONCLUSIONS

: The high level of agreement between the three recall periods suggests that all of them are valid for the investigation of drugs of continuous use.

摘要

目的

以24小时回忆期为参照,评估自我报告药物使用情况的三种回忆期之间的一致性。

方法

将参与者分为三组,回忆期分别为7天、14天和30天,并在两个不同时间进行访谈。在第一次访谈中回答一份24小时回忆问卷,在第二次访谈中回答一份关于所测试不同回忆期内药物使用情况的问卷。使用百分比一致性和kappa系数评估问卷之间的一致性。

结果

对于持续性药物,在测试的三个时期中,百分比一致性在92%至99%之间,kappa系数在0.71至0.97之间。对于偶尔使用的药物,百分比一致性在63%至81%之间,kappa系数在0.27至0.52之间。药物的流行率,尤其是偶尔使用的药物,随时间增加。

结论

三种回忆期之间的高度一致性表明,它们对于调查持续性使用的药物均有效。

相似文献

1
Agreement between different recall periods in drug utilization studies.药物利用研究中不同召回期之间的一致性。
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017 Apr-Jun;20(2):324-334. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201700020012.
2
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence.自我报告与公共登记处病假持续时间的结果差异较大。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;65(2):212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
4
Recall of drug utilization depends on subtle structural questionnaire characteristics.
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Apr;30(2):175-81. doi: 10.1007/s11096-007-9161-8. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
5
Questionnaire design and the recall of pharmacological treatments: a systematic review.问卷设计与药物治疗的回顾:一项系统综述
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Mar;18(3):175-87. doi: 10.1002/pds.1703.
6
Forgetting to remember or remembering to forget: a study of the recall period length in health care survey questions.忘记去记还是记着去忘:医疗保健调查问题中回忆期长度的研究
J Health Econ. 2014 May;35:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
7
Response to past depression treatments is not accurately recalled: comparison of structured recall and patient health questionnaire scores in medical records.既往抑郁治疗反应的回忆并不准确:病历中结构化回忆与患者健康问卷评分的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;73(12):1503-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07883.
8
Dietary intake measured from a self-administered, online 24-hour recall system compared with 4-day diet records in an adult US population.采用自我管理的在线 24 小时回顾系统评估的膳食摄入量与美国成年人的 4 天膳食记录相比。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;112(10):1642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Effect of questionnaire structure on recall of drug utilization in a population of university students.问卷结构对大学生群体药物使用回忆的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jun 29;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-45.
10
Agreement between gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men's period prevalence and event-level recall of sexual behaviour: an observational respondent-driven sampling study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性在性传播感染期间患病率与性行为事件层面回忆之间的一致性:一项观察性应答者驱动抽样研究
Sex Health. 2019 Feb;16(1):84-87. doi: 10.1071/SH17223.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to medicines, the Unified Health System, and intersectional injustices.药品可及性、全民健康覆盖和交叉性不公正。
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Aug 9;58:34. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005986. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating the agreement between different substance use recall periods in multiple HIV cohorts.评估多个艾滋病病毒队列中不同物质使用回忆期之间的一致性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Jan 1;254:111043. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111043. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
Self-medication in children aged 0-12 years in Brazil: a population-based study.
巴西 0-12 岁儿童的自我用药情况:一项基于人群的研究。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023 Jul 10;42:e2022137. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2022137. eCollection 2023.
4
Risk control drives risk assessment and risk review: A cause and effect model of pharmaceutical drug recall on patient safety.风险控制驱动风险评估与风险审查:药品召回对患者安全影响的因果模型
J Med Access. 2023 May 11;7:27550834231170075. doi: 10.1177/27550834231170075. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Use of drugs for gastrointestinal disorders: evidence from National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines.用于胃肠道疾病的药物使用情况:来自全国药品合理使用的获取、使用与推广调查的证据
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020;18:eAO5314. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5314. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
The use of folic acid, iron salts and other vitamins by pregnant women in the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort: is there socioeconomic inequality?2015 年佩洛塔斯出生队列中孕妇使用叶酸、铁盐和其他维生素:是否存在社会经济不平等?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):889. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7269-0.
7
Analgesic use among the Brazilian population: Results from the National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM).巴西人口的镇痛药物使用情况:国家获取、使用和促进合理用药调查(PNAUM)的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214329. eCollection 2019.