• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 CISNET 模型的筛查性乳房 X 光检查推荐的比较。

Comparison of recommendations for screening mammography using CISNET models.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Imaging at New York-Presbyterian, New York, New York.

Department of Radiology, University of Colorado-Denver, School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3673-3680. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30842. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.30842
PMID:28832983
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are several different recommendations for screening mammography from major national health care organizations, including: 1) annual screening at ages 40 to 84 years; 2) screening annually at ages 45 to 54 years, then biennially at ages 55 to 79 years; and 3) biennial screening at ages 50 to 74 years.

METHODS

Mean values of six Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models were used to compare these three screening mammography recommendations in terms of benefits and risks.

RESULTS

Mean mortality reduction was greatest with the recommendation of annual screening at ages 40 to 84 years (39.6%), compared with the hybrid recommendation of screening annually at ages 45 to 54 years, then biennially at ages 55 to 79 years (30.8%), and the recommendation of biennial screening at ages 50 to 74 years (23.2%). For a single-year cohort of US women aged 40 years, assuming 100% compliance, more breast cancers deaths would be averted over their lifetime with annual screening starting at age 40 (29,369) than with the hybrid recommendation (22,829) or biennial screening ages 50-74 (17,153 based on 2009 CISNET estimates, 15,599 based on 2016 CISNET estimates). To achieve the greatest mortality benefit, this single-year cohort of women would have the greatest total number of screening mammograms, benign recalls, and benign biopsies performed over the course of screening by following annual screening starting at age 40 years (90.2 million, 6.8 million, and 481,269, respectively) than by following the hybrid recommendation (49.0 million, 4.1 million, and 286,288, respectively) or biennial screening at ages 50 to 74 years (27.3 million, 2.3 million, and 162,885, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CISNET models demonstrate that the greatest mortality reduction is achieved with annual screening of women starting at age 40 years. Cancer 2017;123:3673-3680. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

摘要

背景

目前,多个主要的国家卫生保健组织提出了不同的筛查乳房 X 线照片的建议,包括:1)40 岁至 84 岁期间每年筛查;2)45 岁至 54 岁期间每年筛查,然后 55 岁至 79 岁期间每两年筛查一次;3)50 岁至 74 岁期间每两年筛查一次。

方法

采用癌症干预和监测建模网络(CISNET)的 6 个模型的平均值,根据获益和风险比较这 3 种筛查乳房 X 线照片的建议。

结果

与 45 岁至 54 岁开始每年筛查,然后 55 岁至 79 岁期间每两年筛查一次的混合建议(30.8%)以及 50 岁至 74 岁期间每两年筛查一次的建议(23.2%)相比,40 岁至 84 岁期间每年筛查可使死亡率降低幅度最大(39.6%)。对于一个年龄为 40 岁的美国女性的单一年龄队列,如果 100%遵循建议,终生避免的乳腺癌死亡人数将随着 40 岁开始每年筛查(29369 例)而高于混合建议(22829 例)或 50-74 岁期间每两年筛查(基于 2009 年 CISNET 估计值为 17153 例,基于 2016 年 CISNET 估计值为 15599 例)。为了获得最大的生存获益,该单一年龄队列的女性将进行最多数量的筛查乳房 X 线照片检查、良性召回和良性活检,遵循 40 岁开始每年筛查(分别为 9020 万次、680 万次和 481269 次)高于遵循混合建议(分别为 4900 万次、410 万次和 286288 次)或 50 岁至 74 岁期间每两年筛查(分别为 2730 万次、230 万次和 162885 次)。

结论

CISNET 模型表明,从 40 岁开始对女性进行每年筛查可获得最大的死亡率降低。癌症 2017;123:3673-3680。©2017 美国癌症协会。

相似文献

1
Comparison of recommendations for screening mammography using CISNET models.基于 CISNET 模型的筛查性乳房 X 光检查推荐的比较。
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3673-3680. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30842. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
2
Collaborative Modeling to Compare Different Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.合作建模比较不同乳腺癌筛查策略:美国预防服务工作组的决策分析。
JAMA. 2024 Jun 11;331(22):1947-1960. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24766.
3
Outcomes of Breast Cancer Screening Strategies Based on Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network Estimates.基于癌症干预和监测建模网络估计的乳腺癌筛查策略的结果。
Radiology. 2024 Feb;310(2):e232658. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232658.
4
Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.乳腺 X 线筛查:降低 1 例乳腺癌死亡需要筛查的人数新估计。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):723-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7146.
5
6
Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.乳腺钼靶筛查策略建模的临床结果
Health Rep. 2015 Dec;26(12):9-15.
7
Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.美国不同乳腺癌筛查策略相关获益与危害的协同建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25. doi: 10.7326/M15-1536. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.平均风险女性的乳腺癌筛查:美国癌症协会2015年指南更新
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783.
9
Estimated Mortality of Breast Cancer Patients Based on Stage at Diagnosis and National Screening Guideline Categorization.基于诊断时的分期和国家筛查指南分类的乳腺癌患者估计死亡率。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Sep;15(9):1206-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:系统评价。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-based tumor size measurement on mammography: agreement with pathology and comparison with human readers' assessments across multiple imaging modalities.基于人工智能的乳腺钼靶摄影肿瘤大小测量:与病理结果的一致性以及与人类阅片者在多种成像模态下评估结果的比较。
Radiol Med. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02033-8.
2
Modeled Benefit of Individual Cancer Signal Origin Prediction for Multi-Cancer Early Detection.个体癌症信号起源预测对多癌早期检测的模拟效益
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 May 1;5(5):814-824. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0351.
3
MODELING EARLY-ONSET CANCER KINETICS TO STUDY CHANGES IN UNDERLYING RISK, DETECTION, AND IMPACT OF POPULATION SCREENING.
模拟早发性癌症动力学以研究潜在风险、检测及人群筛查影响的变化。
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 8:2024.12.05.24318584. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.05.24318584.
4
Patient counseling for breast cancer screening: Taking changes to USPSTF recommendations into account.乳腺癌筛查的患者咨询:考虑美国预防服务工作组建议的变化
OBG Manag. 2023 Dec;35(12):43-49. doi: 10.12788/obgm.0334.
5
Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.根据乳腺密度评估乳腺钼靶筛查性能:放射科医生与独立智能检测的比较。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 22;26(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01821-w.
6
Health benefits and harms of mammography screening in older women (75+ years)-a systematic review.对老年女性(75 岁以上)进行乳房 X 光筛查的健康益处和危害 - 系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Feb;130(2):275-296. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02504-7. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
7
Artificial intelligence for non-mass breast lesions detection and classification on ultrasound images: a comparative study.人工智能在超声图像中非肿块性乳腺病变检测和分类中的应用:一项比较研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02277-2.
8
Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.亚洲女性根据月经周期进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查的诊断性能。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(2):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07087-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.40岁以下亚洲女性乳腺钼靶筛查的性能分析
Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar;30(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01414-5. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
10
The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.地标系列——解决乳腺癌筛查中的差异:黑种女性的新建议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):58-67. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12535-8. Epub 2022 Oct 3.