• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

40岁以下亚洲女性乳腺钼靶筛查的性能分析

Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.

作者信息

Kwon Mi-Ri, Chang Yoosoo, Park Boyoung, Ryu Seungho, Kook Shin Ho

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Republic of Korea.

Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Main Building B2, 250 Taepyung-Ro 2Ga, Jung-Gu, Seoul, 04514, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar;30(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01414-5. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-022-01414-5
PMID:36334183
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening mammography performance among young women remains uncertain in East Asia, where the proportion of young breast cancer patients is higher than that in Western countries. Thus, we analyzed the performance of screening mammography in women under 40 years in comparison with older age groups.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 95,431 Asian women with 197,525 screening mammograms. The reference standard was determined by linkage to the national cancer registry data and the 12-month follow-up outcomes after the index mammogram. The performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value (PPV), recall rate, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), with comparisons across age groups (30 s, 40 s, and ≥ 50 s).

RESULTS

For young women aged < 40 years, sensitivity and AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of screening mammography were 60.4% (50.4-69.7) and 0.73 (0.68-0.77), respectively, with no significant difference compared to women in their 40 s (sensitivity: 64.0% [95% CI: 57.8-69.8], P = 0.52; AUC: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.73-0.78], P = 0.35). The CDR (95% CI) was 0.8 (0.6-1.1) per 1,000 mammograms for young women, poorer than 1.8 (1.6-2.1) per 1,000 mammograms for women in their 40 s (P < 0.001). The PPV and recall rate (95% CI) for young women were 0.6% (0.4-0.7) and 14.9% (14.6-15.1), poorer than 1.4% (1.2-1.6) and 13.3% (13.1-13.5) for women in their 40 s (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of screening mammography for young women in their 30 s was not significantly different from that for women in their 40 s, but the cancer detection and recall rates were poorer.

摘要

背景

在东亚地区,年轻女性的乳腺钼靶筛查效果仍不明确,该地区年轻乳腺癌患者的比例高于西方国家。因此,我们分析了40岁以下女性乳腺钼靶筛查与年龄较大组相比的效果。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了95431名亚洲女性的197525次乳腺钼靶筛查。参考标准通过与国家癌症登记数据及首次乳腺钼靶检查后12个月的随访结果相联系来确定。性能指标包括敏感性、特异性、癌症检出率(CDR)、阳性预测值(PPV)、召回率以及受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC),并对不同年龄组(30多岁、40多岁及≥50岁)进行比较。

结果

对于年龄<40岁的年轻女性,乳腺钼靶筛查的敏感性和AUC(95%置信区间[CI])分别为60.4%(50.4 - 69.7)和0.73(0.68 - 0.77),与40多岁的女性相比无显著差异(敏感性:64.0%[95%CI:57.8 - 69.8],P = 0.52;AUC:0.75[95%CI:0.73 - 0.78],P = 0.35)。年轻女性每1000次乳腺钼靶检查的CDR(95%CI)为0.8(0.6 - 1.1),低于40多岁女性每1000次乳腺钼靶检查的1.8(1.6 - 2.1)(P < 0.001)。年轻女性的PPV和召回率(95%CI)分别为0.6%(0.4 - 0.7)和14.9%(14.6 - 15.1),低于40多岁女性的1.4%(1.2 - 1.6)和13.3%(13.1 - 13.5)(P < 0.001)。

结论

30多岁年轻女性乳腺钼靶筛查的准确性与40多岁女性无显著差异,但癌症检出率和召回率较低。

相似文献

1
Performance analysis of screening mammography in Asian women under 40 years.40岁以下亚洲女性乳腺钼靶筛查的性能分析
Breast Cancer. 2023 Mar;30(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01414-5. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
2
Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.根据乳腺密度评估乳腺钼靶筛查性能:放射科医生与独立智能检测的比较。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 22;26(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01821-w.
3
Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.40 岁以下女性首次乳房 X 光检查的表现。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 19;102(10):692-701. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq090. Epub 2010 May 3.
4
Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.在国家乳腺数据库中按种族和年龄划分的乳腺 X 光筛查表现:来自 13181241 名女性的 29479665 次乳腺 X 光筛查。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):599-612. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07124-6. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
5
Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.不同类型乳腺摄影设备对筛查结果的影响:韩国乳腺癌筛查联盟报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1638-1645. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0006.
6
7
Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.韩国乳腺癌筛查联盟关于乳腺钼靶筛查的报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(4):489-96. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.亚洲女性根据月经周期进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查的诊断性能。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(2):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07087-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
9
BreastScreen-based mammography screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer, Western Australian study.基于乳腺筛查的乳腺癌患者乳腺钼靶筛查:来自澳大利亚西部的研究。
Med J Aust. 2011 Oct 17;195(8):460-4. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10702.
10
Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.解读性能和数字乳腺摄影测试集的观察者间一致性。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Feb;20(2):218-224. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0193.

引用本文的文献

1
Value of deep learning model for predicting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 and 4A lesions on mammography.深度学习模型对乳腺钼靶摄影中乳腺影像报告和数据系统3类及4A类病变的预测价值。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):4047-4058. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1523. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Biennial Mammography Performance in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program From 2009 to 2020.2009年至2020年韩国国家癌症筛查计划中的两年一次乳房X线摄影检查情况
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Apr;26(4):313-323. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0866. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.美国放射学会和乳腺影像学会更新:所有平均风险的女性均适用的乳腺癌筛查推荐。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Sep;18(9):1280-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Jun 19.
2
Breast Cancer Mortality Rates Have Stopped Declining in U.S. Women Younger than 40 Years.美国 40 岁以下女性的乳腺癌死亡率已停止下降。
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):143-149. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203476. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.
乳腺钼靶影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分布分析及超声随访评估:一项单中心研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2025 Feb 6;17:115-122. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S481201. eCollection 2025.
4
Concordant and discordant breast density patterns by different approaches for assessing breast density and breast cancer risk.通过不同方法评估乳腺密度和乳腺癌风险时的一致和不一致乳腺密度模式。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Feb;210(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07541-1. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
5
Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.根据乳腺密度评估乳腺钼靶筛查性能:放射科医生与独立智能检测的比较。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 22;26(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01821-w.
6
Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.亚洲女性根据月经周期进行筛查性乳房 X 光检查的诊断性能。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(2):357-366. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07087-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women.数字乳腺 X 线摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查的效果:超过 800 万韩国女性的对比研究。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):247-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Breast cancer statistics, 2019.乳腺癌统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):438-451. doi: 10.3322/caac.21583. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
6
Insights Into Breast Cancer in the East vs the West: A Review.东西方乳腺癌研究洞察:综述
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;5(10):1489-1496. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0620.
7
Cancer screening recommendations: an international comparison of high income countries.癌症筛查建议:高收入国家的国际比较
Public Health Rev. 2018 Mar 2;39:7. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0080-0. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparison of recommendations for screening mammography using CISNET models.基于 CISNET 模型的筛查性乳房 X 光检查推荐的比较。
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3673-3680. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30842. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
9
Breast cancer in young women: an overview.年轻女性乳腺癌概述
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):313-317. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0424-1. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
10
Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.韩国乳腺癌筛查联盟关于乳腺钼靶筛查的报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;17(4):489-96. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.4.489. Epub 2016 Jun 27.