• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

50 克葡萄糖挑战试验检测国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组标准定义的高血糖的准确性。

Accuracy of 50-g glucose challenge test to detect International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria-defined hyperglycemia.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mother and Child Hospital, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):312-317. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12304. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12304
PMID:28833075
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of the 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in detecting hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) across a range of glucose thresholds relative to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups diagnostic criteria, and to determine the accuracy of the 50-g GCT among patients with different risk status.

METHODS

The present prospective cohort study included women aged 18-45 years at 24-31  weeks of pregnancy who presented at the Mother and Child Hospital, Akure, Nigeria, between September 1, 2015, and February 29, 2016. Patients underwent the 50-g GCT followed by the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The accuracy of different 50-g GCT thresholds in diagnosing HIP was assessed based on International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups diagnostic criteria, with the 75-g OGTT used as a clinical reference standard.

RESULTS

Of 280 patients enrolled, 46 (16.4%) had HIP. The sensitivity of the 50-g GCT to detect HIP decreased from 47.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.9-63.1) at a 7.2-mmol/L threshold to 32.6% (95% CI, 19.5-48.0) at a 8.0-mmol/L threshold; the specificity improved from 84.2% (95% CI, 78.9-88.6) to 95.3% (95% CI, 91.7-97.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 50-g GCT performed poorly compared with the 75-g OGTT for detecting HIP. It appears to be an unsuitable replacement for the 75-g OGTT.

摘要

目的

确定在一系列葡萄糖阈值下,50 克葡萄糖挑战试验(GCT)相对于国际妊娠糖尿病协会诊断标准检测妊娠高血糖(HIP)的准确性,并确定不同风险状态患者中 50 克 GCT 的准确性。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2015 年 9 月 1 日至 2016 年 2 月 29 日在尼日利亚阿库雷母子医院就诊的年龄在 18-45 岁、妊娠 24-31 周的女性患者。患者接受 50 克 GCT 后行 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。根据国际妊娠糖尿病协会诊断标准,评估不同 50 克 GCT 阈值诊断 HIP 的准确性,以 75 克 OGTT 作为临床参考标准。

结果

在纳入的 280 名患者中,有 46 名(16.4%)患有 HIP。50 克 GCT 检测 HIP 的敏感性从 7.2mmol/L 阈值时的 47.8%(95%可信区间[CI],32.9-63.1)下降至 8.0mmol/L 阈值时的 32.6%(95%CI,19.5-48.0);特异性从 84.2%(95%CI,78.9-88.6)提高到 95.3%(95%CI,91.7-97.6)。

结论

50 克 GCT 与 75 克 OGTT 相比,检测 HIP 的性能较差。它似乎不适合替代 75 克 OGTT。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of 50-g glucose challenge test to detect International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria-defined hyperglycemia.50 克葡萄糖挑战试验检测国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组标准定义的高血糖的准确性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):312-317. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12304. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
The impact of adoption of the international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes.国际妊娠糖尿病协会标准用于妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):224.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
To evaluate the prevalence and clinical outcomes using a one-step method versus a two-step method to screen gestational diabetes mellitus.评估采用一步法与两步法筛查妊娠期糖尿病的患病率及临床结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jan;27(1):36-41. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.799656. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Abnormal results on a second testing and risk of gestational diabetes in women with normal baseline glucose levels.基线血糖水平正常的女性二次检测结果异常与妊娠期糖尿病风险
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Feb;100(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of random plasma glucose and random blood capillary glucose in detecting international association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups- defined hyperglycemia in early pregnancy.随机血浆葡萄糖和随机毛细血管血糖检测国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组定义的孕早期高血糖的诊断准确性
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;23(8):1087-1094. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_221_19.
6
Does gestational diabetes affect fetal growth and pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancies?妊娠期糖尿病是否会影响双胎妊娠的胎儿生长和妊娠结局?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):653.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant females.孕妇妊娠糖尿病的筛查
Saudi Med J. 2000 Feb;21(2):155-60.
8
Glucose challenge test for detecting gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.葡萄糖挑战试验用于检测妊娠期糖尿病:系统评价。
BJOG. 2012 Mar;119(4):393-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03254.x. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
Evaluation of 75 g glucose load in non-fasting state [Diabetes in Pregnancy Study group of India (DIPSI) criteria] as a diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus.以印度妊娠糖尿病研究组(DIPSI)标准评估非空腹状态下75克葡萄糖负荷试验作为妊娠期糖尿病的诊断试验。
Indian J Med Res. 2017 Feb;145(2):209-214. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1716_15.
10
Gestational diabetes: comparision of the carpenter and the coustan thresholds with the new thresholds of Turkish women and implications of variations in diagnostic criteria.妊娠期糖尿病:将卡彭特(Carpenter)和库斯坦(Coustan)阈值与土耳其女性的新阈值进行比较以及诊断标准变化的影响
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jun;25(6):616-22. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.592231. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.比较 COVID-19 大流行前后妊娠期糖尿病的筛查方法:系统评价。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Apr;15(4):500-516. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14128. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
2
Burden, risk factors and maternal and offspring outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区(SSA)妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的负担、危险因素以及母婴结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 28;19(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2593-z.
3
Prevalence and determinants of gestational diabetes mellitus in Africa based on the updated international diagnostic criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于最新国际诊断标准的非洲妊娠期糖尿病患病率及影响因素:系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Public Health. 2019 Aug 6;77:36. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0362-0. eCollection 2019.