J Neurochem. 2017 Sep;142(5):776-777. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14061. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
'Anti-inflammatory properties of tianeptine on lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in microglial cells involve toll-like receptor-related pathways' by Slusarczyk, J., Trojan, E., Glombik, K., Piotrowska, A., Budziszewska, B., Kubera, M., Popiolek-Barczyk, K., Lason, W., Mika, J. and Basta-Kaim, A. The above article from the Journal of Neurochemistry published on 14 February 2016 on Wiley Online Library ( www.onlinelibrary.com), and in Volume 136, pp. 958-970, is being retracted by agreement between the corresponding author Agnieszka Basta-Kaim, the Journal's Editor-in-Chief Jörg Schulz, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Editorial Office was alerted by a science journalist that the same Western Blot lane had been used to represent two different proteins. The Western Blot signal of iNOS in Fig. 4a was supposedly identical to the Western Blot signal of phospho-JNK in Fig. 6b. The corresponding author stated that "on the final step of figure 6 preparation the first author made, by mistake, an incorrect attachment of representative p-JNK blots." A corrected Fig. 6b is enclosed below. The second concern reaching the Editorial Office was that the same Western Blot signal appeared to have been used to represent two different experimental conditions: the iNOS control signal (-/- LPS/TIA Fig. 4a) appears as a horizontal and vertical mirror image of the last signal in this line (+/10 LPS/TIA Fig. 4a). The raw membrane which was used to produce Fig. 4a is enclosed on the next page and highlights the steps that were undertaken during figure preparation. Although the initial concern was not proven, concerns remained regarding the question how an inadvertent flipping of the first Western blot lane could happen. A corrected Fig. 4a prepared by the corresponding author from the raw image of iNOS western blot depicted above, without flipped first lane, is presented below: Although the corresponding author provided a large amount of evidence to explain disparities in the presentation of Western Blot images, due to the number of inconsistencies that were revealed during review of the provided evidence and the inability to confirm the nature of the steps that led to them, it was felt that the above mentioned Western Blot images presented in this publication were not reliable, even if the conclusions may still be valid. The first author would like to apologize to the readers, reviewers and editors of Journal of Neurochemistry for the errors. Reference Slusarczyk J., Trojan E., Glombik K., Piotrowska A., Budziszewska B., Kubera M., Popiolek-Barczyk K., Lason W., Mika J. and Basta-Kaim A. (2016) Anti-inflammatory properties of tianeptine on lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in microglial cells involve toll-like receptor-related pathways. J. Neurochem. 136, 958-970. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13452.
《噻奈普汀对脂多糖诱导的小胶质细胞变化的抗炎特性涉及Toll样受体相关途径》,作者为斯卢萨尔奇克、J.、特罗扬、E.、格隆比克、K.、皮奥特罗夫斯卡、A.、布齐谢夫斯卡、B.、库贝拉、M.、波皮奥莱克-巴尔奇克、K.、拉松、W.、米卡、J.和巴斯塔-凯姆、A.。上述发表于《神经化学杂志》2016年2月14日、刊载于威利在线图书馆(www.onlinelibrary.com)、第136卷第958 - 970页的文章,经通讯作者阿格涅什卡·巴斯塔-凯姆、该杂志主编约尔格·舒尔茨与约翰·威利父子有限公司协商后予以撤回。一位科学记者提醒编辑部,同一条蛋白质免疫印迹泳道被用于代表两种不同的蛋白质。图4a中诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)的蛋白质免疫印迹信号据推测与图6b中磷酸化应激活化蛋白激酶(p-JNK)的蛋白质免疫印迹信号相同。通讯作者称:“在图6准备的最后一步,第一作者误将代表性的p-JNK印迹错误粘贴。”下方附上修正后的图6b。编辑部收到的第二个问题是,同一条蛋白质免疫印迹信号似乎被用于代表两种不同的实验条件:iNOS对照信号(-/- LPS/TIA图4a)呈现为此行最后一个信号(+/10 LPS/TIA图4a)的水平和垂直镜像。用于制作图4a的原始膜附于下一页,并突出显示了图制作过程中所采取的步骤。尽管最初的问题未得到证实,但对于第一个蛋白质免疫印迹泳道如何意外翻转仍存疑虑。通讯作者根据上述iNOS蛋白质免疫印迹的原始图像制作的、未翻转第一条泳道的修正图4a如下所示:尽管通讯作者提供了大量证据来解释蛋白质免疫印迹图像呈现中的差异,但由于在审查所提供证据过程中发现的不一致数量众多,且无法确认导致这些差异的步骤性质,因此认为本出版物中上述蛋白质免疫印迹图像不可靠,即便结论可能仍然有效。第一作者就这些错误向《神经化学杂志》的读者、审稿人和编辑致歉。参考文献:斯卢萨尔奇克、J.、特罗扬、E.、格隆比克、K.、皮奥特罗夫斯卡、A.、布齐谢夫斯卡、B.、库贝拉、M.、波皮奥莱克-巴尔奇克、K.、拉松、W.、米卡、J.和巴斯塔-凯姆、A.(2016年)。噻奈普汀对脂多糖诱导的小胶质细胞变化的抗炎特性涉及Toll样受体相关途径。《神经化学杂志》136卷,958 - 970页。https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13452 。