Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):407-424. doi: 10.1111/jan.13444. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
To test the psychometric properties and clinical usability of a new Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instrument including inter-rater and test-retest reliability, convergent validity and data completeness.
Methodological and practical limitations associated with traditional Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instruments, prompted a programme to work to develop a new instrument, as part of the National Institute for Health Research funded, Pressure UlceR Programme Of reSEarch (RP-PG-0407-10056).
Observational field test.
For this clinical evaluation 230 patients were purposefully sampled across four broad levels of pressure ulcer risk with representation from four secondary care and four community NHS Trusts in England. Blinded and simultaneous paired (ward/community nurse and expert nurse) PURPOSE-T assessments were undertaken. Follow-up retest was undertaken by the expert nurse. Field notes of PURPOSE-T use were collected. Data were collected October 2012-January 2013.
The clinical evaluation demonstrated "very good" (kappa) inter-rater and test-retest agreement for PURPOSE-T assessment decision overall. The percentage agreement for "problem/no problem" was over 75% for the main risk factors. Convergent validity demonstrated moderate to high associations with other measures of similar constructs.
The PURPOSE-T evaluation facilitated the initial validation and clinical usability of the instrument and demonstrated that PURPOSE-T is suitable of use in clinical practice. Further study is needed to evaluate the impact of using the instrument on care processes and outcomes.
测试一种新的压疮风险评估工具的心理测量学特性和临床可用性,包括评分者间信度、重测信度、聚合效度和数据完整性。
传统压疮风险评估工具存在方法学和实际限制,因此启动了一项计划,旨在开发一种新工具,作为国家健康研究所资助的压疮研究计划(RP-PG-0407-10056)的一部分。
观察性现场测试。
为了进行这项临床评估,在英格兰的四个二级保健和四个社区国民保健信托基金会中,有目的抽样了 230 名处于不同压疮风险级别的患者,具有代表性。进行了盲法和同时的配对(病房/社区护士和专家护士)PURPOSE-T 评估。由专家护士进行随访复测。收集了 PURPOSE-T 使用的现场记录。数据收集于 2012 年 10 月至 2013 年 1 月。
临床评估表明,PURPOSE-T 评估决策的评分者间和重测信度总体上为“非常好”(kappa)。主要风险因素的“有问题/无问题”的百分比一致性超过 75%。聚合效度表明与其他类似结构的测量方法有中度至高度关联。
PURPOSE-T 评估促进了该工具的初步验证和临床可用性,并表明 PURPOSE-T 适合在临床实践中使用。需要进一步研究评估使用该工具对护理过程和结果的影响。