• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测医院获得性压疮的风险因素和列线图预测模型。

Risk factors and the potential of nomogram for predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Department of Service Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):974-986. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13362. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.13362
PMID:32255565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7949427/
Abstract

This 1:5 case-control study aimed to identify the risk factors of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) and to develop a mathematical model of nomogram for the risk prediction of HAPIs. Data for 370 patients with HAPIs and 1971 patients without HAPIs were extracted from the adverse events and the electronic medical systems. They were randomly divided into two sets: training (n = 1951) and validation (n = 390). Significant risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses in the training set, followed by a nomogram constructed. Age, independent movement, sensory perception and response, moisture, perfusion, use of medical devices, compulsive position, hypoalbuminaemia, an existing pressure injury or scarring from a previous pressure injury, and surgery sufferings were considered significant risk factors and were included to construct a nomogram. In both of the training and validation sets, the areas of 0.90 under the receiver operating characteristic curves showed excellent discrimination of the nomogram; calibration plots demonstrated a good consistency between the observed probability and the nomogram's prediction; decision curve analyses exhibited preferable net benefit along with the threshold probability in the nomogram. The excellent performance of the nomogram makes it a convenient and reliable tool for the risk prediction of HAPIs.

摘要

本 1:5 病例对照研究旨在确定医院获得性压疮(HAPI)的风险因素,并建立 HAPI 风险预测的列线图数学模型。从不良事件和电子病历系统中提取了 370 例 HAPI 患者和 1971 例无 HAPI 患者的数据。将其随机分为两组:训练集(n = 1951)和验证集(n = 390)。在训练集中,通过单因素和多因素分析确定了显著的风险因素,然后构建了一个列线图。年龄、独立活动、感觉知觉和反应、湿度、灌注、使用医疗器械、强制性体位、低白蛋白血症、现有的压疮或先前压疮的疤痕以及手术痛苦被认为是显著的风险因素,并被纳入构建列线图。在训练集和验证集中,ROC 曲线下的面积为 0.90,表明该列线图具有出色的区分度;校准图显示观察概率与列线图预测之间具有良好的一致性;决策曲线分析显示,该列线图在阈值概率下具有较好的净获益。该列线图性能优异,是一种方便可靠的 HAPI 风险预测工具。

相似文献

1
Risk factors and the potential of nomogram for predicting hospital-acquired pressure injuries.预测医院获得性压疮的风险因素和列线图预测模型。
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):974-986. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13362. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Risk factors and the nomogram model for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children with brain tumours: A retrospective study.术中获得性压力性损伤在脑肿瘤儿童中的风险因素和列线图模型:一项回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2250-2259. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14106. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting long-term overall survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A population-based study.预测鼻咽癌长期总生存列线图的构建与验证:一项基于人群的研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18974. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018974.
4
Nomogram for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a retrospective study.体外循环心脏手术患儿术中获得性压力性损伤的列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04989-4.
5
Development of a nomogram for predicting nasogastric tube-associated pressure injuries in intensive care unit patients.建立重症监护病房患者鼻胃管相关压力性损伤预测列线图。
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Aug;30(3):324-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
Development and Validation of a Risk Nomogram Model for Predicting Community-Acquired Pressure Injury Among the Older Adults in China: A Case-Control Study.中国老年人社区获得性压力性损伤风险列线图模型的建立与验证:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Oct 1;17:1471-1482. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S380994. eCollection 2022.
7
Development and Validation of a Nomogram-Based Prognostic Evaluation Model for Sarcomatoid Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肉瘤样肝细胞癌列线图预后评估模型的建立与验证。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3185-3205. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01357-3. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Nomogram model on estimating the risk of pressure injuries for hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit.用于估算重症监护病房住院患者压力性损伤风险的列线图模型。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Feb;80:103566. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103566. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
9
Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients after Acute Stroke.急性脑卒中后下肢深静脉血栓形成的列线图的建立与验证。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105683. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105683. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram: A tool to predict the risk of getting severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).基于机器学习的列线图的构建与验证:预测 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症风险的工具。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021 Jun;9(2):595-607. doi: 10.1002/iid3.421. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for hospital-acquired pressure injury in neurosurgery inpatients: a real-world prospective cohort study.神经外科住院患者医院获得性压力性损伤的危险因素:一项真实世界前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):29327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15648-8.
2
A Predictive Model of Pressure Injury in Children Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.基于机器学习算法的活体肝移植儿童压力性损伤预测模型
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jun;81(6):3003-3012. doi: 10.1111/jan.16449. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
3
Systematic Review for Risks of Pressure Injury and Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms.使用机器学习算法对压力性损伤风险和预测模型的系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;13(17):2739. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172739.
4
Construction and external validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter case-control study.构建并外部验证内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄风险预测列线图模型:一项多中心病例对照研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 1;23(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02855-8.
5
Risk factors and the nomogram model for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children with brain tumours: A retrospective study.术中获得性压力性损伤在脑肿瘤儿童中的风险因素和列线图模型:一项回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):2250-2259. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14106. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of pressure injury in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.用于预测接受腹部手术的成年患者发生压疮风险的列线图的开发与验证
Int J Nurs Sci. 2022 Sep 24;9(4):438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2022.09.010. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm-based risk prediction model of pressure injury in the intensive care unit.基于机器学习算法的 ICU 压力性损伤风险预测模型的开发与验证。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1637-1649. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13764. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of a logistic regression model to develop a risk assessment of intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcer.运用逻辑回归模型对术中获得性压疮的风险进行评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Aug;27(15-16):2984-2992. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14491. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.临床预测模型的判别与校准:医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
3
Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).新型压疮风险评估工具——压疮风险初级或次级评估工具(PURPOSE T)的临床评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):407-424. doi: 10.1111/jan.13444. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
4
Pressure Ulcers Prevalence in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review, 2000-2015.急性护理环境中压疮的患病率:一项2000 - 2015年的系统评价
Clin Nurs Res. 2018 Jul;27(6):643-659. doi: 10.1177/1054773817705541. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Risk factors for pressure injuries among critical care patients: A systematic review.重症监护患者发生压疮的危险因素:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:97-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
A latent structural equation model of protective behaviors and pressure ulcer outcomes among people living with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者中保护行为与压疮结局的潜在结构方程模型
Spinal Cord. 2017 Feb;55(2):135-140. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.166. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System.修订后的国家压疮咨询委员会压力性损伤分期系统:修订后的压力性损伤分期系统。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;43(6):585-597. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000281.
8
Successful factors to prevent pressure ulcers - an interview study.预防压疮的成功因素——一项访谈研究
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jan;26(1-2):182-189. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13465.
9
A predictive model for pressure ulcer outcome: the Wound Healing Index.压力性溃疡结局的预测模型:伤口愈合指数。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015 Dec;28(12):560-72; quiz 573-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000473131.10948.e7.
10
Knowledge and practice of nurses towards prevention of pressure ulcer and associated factors in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学医院护士对压疮预防的认知与实践及相关因素
BMC Nurs. 2015 May 16;14:34. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0076-8. eCollection 2015.