Brolin Rosita, Syrén Susanne, Rask Mikael, Sandgren Anna, Brunt David
Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Center for Collaborative Palliative Care, Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):603-611. doi: 10.1111/scs.12485. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
The major aim of the present study was to explore what people with psychiatric disabilities, living in two different types of housing, consider to be the best and the worst in their housing situation. A secondary aim was to explore to what extent additional questions to a questionnaire with a free-response format can provide complementary information to the previous knowledge in the field. The content analysis revealed that the physical attributes were of great significance for the residents in ordinary housing, while both psychosocial aspects and physical attributes were important for those living in supported housing. When providing good housing solutions for people with psychiatric disabilities, attention needs to be given to these aspects by politicians, policymakers as well as by nursing staff.
本研究的主要目的是探究居住在两种不同类型住房中的精神疾病患者认为其住房状况中最好和最差的方面。次要目的是探究在一份采用自由回答格式的问卷中增加问题能在多大程度上为该领域的现有知识提供补充信息。内容分析表明，对于居住在普通住房中的居民而言，物理属性非常重要，而对于居住在支持性住房中的居民来说，心理社会方面和物理属性都很重要。在为精神疾病患者提供良好的住房解决方案时，政治家、政策制定者以及护理人员都需要关注这些方面。
