Verbeek Hilde, Worden Angela, Wilberforce Mark, Brand Christian, Tucker Sue, Abendstern Michele, Challis David
Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK.
CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;33(3):475-481. doi: 10.1002/gps.4775. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Integrated community mental health teams (CMHTs) are a key component of specialist old age psychiatry services internationally. However, in England, significant shifts in policy, including a focus on dementia and age inclusive services, have influenced provision. This study portrays teams in 2009 against which subsequent service provision may be compared.
A bespoke national postal survey of CMHT managers collected data on teams' structure, composition, organisation, working practices, case management, and liaison activities.
A total of 376 CMHTs (88%) responded. Teams comprised a widespread of disciplines. However, just 28% contained the full complement of professionals recommended by government policy. Over 93% of teams had a single point of access, but some GPs bypassed this, and 40% of teams did not accept direct referrals from care homes. Initial assessments were undertaken by multiple disciplines, and 71% of teams used common assessment documentation. Nevertheless, many social workers maintained both NHS and local authority records. In 92% of teams, nominated care coordinators oversaw the support provided by other team members. However, inter-agency care coordination was less prevalent. Few teams offered the range of outreach/liaison activities anticipated in the national dementia strategy.
Compared with previous studies, teams had grown and changed, with a clear increase in non-medical practitioners, particularly support workers. Measures to facilitate integrated care within CMHTs (eg, common access and documentation) were widespread, but integration across health and social care/primary and secondary services was less developed. Consideration of barriers to further integration, and the impact of current reforms is potentially fruitful.
综合性社区心理健康团队(CMHTs)是国际老年专科精神病学服务的关键组成部分。然而,在英格兰,政策发生了重大转变,包括对痴呆症和年龄包容性服务的关注,这对服务提供产生了影响。本研究描绘了2009年的团队情况,以便与后续的服务提供情况进行比较。
对CMHT经理进行了一项定制的全国邮政调查,收集了有关团队结构、组成、组织、工作实践、病例管理和联络活动的数据。
共有376个CMHT(88%)做出了回应。团队由广泛的学科组成。然而,只有28%的团队拥有政府政策推荐的全部专业人员。超过93%的团队有单一的接入点,但一些全科医生绕过了这一点,40%的团队不接受来自养老院的直接转诊。初始评估由多个学科进行,71%的团队使用通用评估文件。尽管如此,许多社会工作者同时保留了国民保健服务(NHS)和地方当局的记录。在92%的团队中,指定的护理协调员监督其他团队成员提供的支持。然而,跨机构护理协调并不普遍。很少有团队提供国家痴呆症战略中预期的一系列外展/联络活动。
与之前的研究相比,团队有所发展和变化,非医疗从业者,尤其是支持人员明显增加。促进CMHT内部综合护理的措施(如通用接入和文件)很普遍,但卫生与社会护理/初级和二级服务之间的整合发展较差。考虑进一步整合的障碍以及当前改革的影响可能会有成效。