Suppr超能文献

但是游泳和骑自行车呢?在使用计步器评估身体活动时,如何“计算”非步行活动。

But What About Swimming and Cycling? How to "Count" Non-Ambulatory Activity When Using Pedometers to Assess Physical Activity.

作者信息

Miller Ruth, Brown Wendy, Tudor-Locke Catrine

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2006 Jul;3(3):257-266. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.3.257.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to describe the amount of non-ambulatory physical activity (PA) undertaken by a sample of Australian workers, and to evaluate different methods of accounting for non-ambulatory activities when using pedometers to measure physical activity.

METHODS

Adults age 18 to 64 y (N = 204) wore a pedometer and recorded steps and non-step activity in a logbook for 7 d. Non-ambulatory activity was recorded by 28% of the participants (N = 52) with cycling and swimming the most frequently reported.

RESULTS

The mean time reported for non-ambulatory activities was 82.8 (standard deviation 80.0) min/wk. On average, participants recorded 8873 (standard deviation 2757) steps/d. Time in non-ambulatory activities was converted to steps equivalents using three different conversion methods. Use of the three methods added 333 to 721 steps/d in the whole sample, but 1153 to 2566 steps/d for those who reported non-ambulatory activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Suggestions are provided for accounting for non-ambulatory activities in interventions which rely on step count measures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在描述澳大利亚工人样本中进行的非步行身体活动(PA)量,并评估在使用计步器测量身体活动时计算非步行活动的不同方法。

方法

18至64岁的成年人(N = 204)佩戴计步器,并在日志中记录步数和非步数活动,为期7天。28%的参与者(N = 52)记录了非步行活动,其中骑自行车和游泳是最常报告的活动。

结果

报告的非步行活动平均时间为82.8(标准差80.0)分钟/周。参与者平均每天记录8873(标准差2757)步。使用三种不同的转换方法将非步行活动时间转换为等效步数。在整个样本中,使用这三种方法每天增加333至721步,但对于报告非步行活动的人来说,每天增加1153至2566步。

结论

针对依赖步数测量的干预措施中计算非步行活动提供了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验