Suppr超能文献

径向探头支气管内超声引导下经支气管活检及计算机断层扫描引导下经胸壁针吸活检在周围型肺病变诊断中的价值

Value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions.

作者信息

Zhang Qiudi, Zhang Sujuan, Xu Xiong, Xu Qianqian, Zhou Jun

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Changzhou First People's Hospital), Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(34):e7843. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007843.

Abstract

Computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration (CT-TTNA) is a minimally invasive technique for sampling peripheral lung lesions. Radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (rEBUS-TBB) is an alternative. The present study analyzed and compared rEBUS-TBB and CT-TTNA in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL).Clinical data of 513 patients with PPL who underwent an rEBUS-TBB or CT-TTNA examination were analyzed retrospectively. The positive diagnostic rate, complication rate, and influencing factors of the 2 methods were compared.The positive diagnostic rate and complication rate were significantly higher in CT-TTNA than rEBUS-TBB (P = .001; P < .001, respectively). The rEBUS-TBB group showed a higher positive diagnostic rate in larger lesions (>2 cm) than in smaller (≤2 cm) (P = .012), and was lower in the lesions proximal to the chest wall than those distally located (P = .046); no significant difference was observed in the different pulmonary segments (P = .109). In the CT-TTNA group, the positive diagnostic rate in larger lesions did not differ significantly than the smaller lesions (P = .05); it differed significantly in different segments (P = .044). The incidence of pneumothorax was lower in lesions proximal to the chest wall than those located distally (P = .037). In the rEBUS-TBB group, the success rate of the exploration and biopsy of the lesions was 87.4%; the rate of exploration of larger lesions and with bronchial sign was higher than smaller lesions and without bronchial sign (P < .001; P < .001, respectively) while that of lesions close to the chest wall was lower than those distally located (P = .006).rEBUS-TBB and CT-TTNA are effective and safe in the diagnosis of PPL. The positive diagnostic rate of CT-TTNA is higher than rEBUS-TBB. The incidence of pneumothorax in CT-TTNA is higher than rEBUS-TBB. CT-TTNA is selected for smaller lesions close to the chest wall; rEBUS-TBB is used for lesions larger, distal from the chest wall or with a bronchial sign.

摘要

计算机断层扫描引导下经胸针吸活检术(CT-TTNA)是一种用于获取外周肺病变样本的微创技术。径向支气管内超声引导下经支气管活检术(rEBUS-TBB)是另一种选择。本研究分析并比较了rEBUS-TBB和CT-TTNA在诊断外周肺病变(PPL)中的应用。回顾性分析了513例行rEBUS-TBB或CT-TTNA检查的PPL患者的临床资料。比较了两种方法的阳性诊断率、并发症发生率及影响因素。CT-TTNA的阳性诊断率和并发症发生率显著高于rEBUS-TBB(P = 0.001;P < 0.001)。rEBUS-TBB组中,较大病变(>2 cm)的阳性诊断率高于较小病变(≤2 cm)(P = 0.012),靠近胸壁的病变阳性诊断率低于远离胸壁的病变(P = 0.046);不同肺段间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.109)。在CT-TTNA组中,较大病变的阳性诊断率与较小病变相比差异无统计学意义(P = 0.05);不同肺段间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.044)。靠近胸壁的病变气胸发生率低于远离胸壁的病变(P = 0.037)。在rEBUS-TBB组中,病变探查及活检成功率为87.4%;较大病变及有支气管征的病变探查率高于较小病变及无支气管征的病变(P < 0.001;P < 0.001),靠近胸壁的病变探查率低于远离胸壁的病变(P = 0.006)。rEBUS-TBB和CT-TTNA在PPL诊断中均有效且安全。CT-TTNA的阳性诊断率高于rEBUS-TBB。CT-TTNA的气胸发生率高于rEBUS-TBB。靠近胸壁的较小病变选择CT-TTNA;较大、远离胸壁或有支气管征的病变采用rEBUS-TBB。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Inheritance and innovation of the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions.周围型肺部病变诊断的传承与创新
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jan 27;14:20406223221146723. doi: 10.1177/20406223221146723. eCollection 2023.
6

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验