Fackrell Kathryn, Smith Harriet, Colley Veronica, Thacker Brian, Horobin Adele, Haider Haúla F, Londero Alain, Mazurek Birgit, Hall Deborah A
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Centre, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.
Otology and Hearing Group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Trials. 2017 Aug 23;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2123-0.
The reporting of outcomes in clinical trials of subjective tinnitus indicates that many different tinnitus-related complaints are of interest to investigators, from perceptual attributes of the sound (e.g. loudness) to psychosocial impacts (e.g. quality of life). Even when considering one type of intervention strategy for subjective tinnitus, there is no agreement about what is critically important for deciding whether a treatment is effective. The main purpose of this observational study is, therefore to, develop Core Outcome Domain Sets for the three different intervention strategies (sound, psychological, and pharmacological) for adults with chronic subjective tinnitus that should be measured and reported in every clinical trial of these interventions. Secondary objectives are to identify the strengths and limitations of our study design for recruiting and reducing attrition of participants, and to explore uptake of the core outcomes.
The 'Core Outcome Measures in Tinnitus: International Delphi' (COMIT'ID) study will use a mixed-methods approach that incorporates input from health care users at the pre-Delphi stage, a modified three-round Delphi survey and final consensus meetings (one for each intervention). The meetings will generate recommendations by stakeholder representatives on agreed Core Outcome Domain Sets specific to each intervention. A subsequent step will establish a common cross-cutting Core Outcome Domain Set by identifying the common outcome domains included in all three intervention-specific Core Outcome Domain Sets. To address the secondary objectives, we will gather feedback from participants about their experience of taking part in the Delphi process. We aspire to conduct an observational cohort study to evaluate uptake of the core outcomes in published studies at 7 years following Core Outcome Set publication.
The COMIT'ID study aims to develop a Core Outcome Domain Set that is agreed as critically important for deciding whether a treatment for subjective tinnitus is effective. Such a recommendation would help to standardise future clinical trials worldwide and so we will determine if participation increases use of the Core Outcome Set in the long term.
This project has been registered (November 2014) in the database of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative.
主观性耳鸣临床试验结果报告表明,从声音的感知属性(如响度)到心理社会影响(如生活质量),许多不同的耳鸣相关主诉都受到研究者的关注。即使考虑针对主观性耳鸣的一种干预策略,对于判定一种治疗是否有效,关键的重要因素是什么也没有达成共识。因此,这项观察性研究的主要目的是,为患有慢性主观性耳鸣的成年人开发针对三种不同干预策略(声音、心理和药物)的核心结局领域集,在这些干预措施的每项临床试验中都应进行测量和报告。次要目标是确定我们用于招募和减少参与者损耗的研究设计的优势和局限性,并探索核心结局的采用情况。
“耳鸣核心结局测量:国际德尔菲法”(COMIT'ID)研究将采用混合方法,该方法在德尔菲法前阶段纳入医疗保健使用者的意见、经过修改的三轮德尔菲调查以及最终共识会议(每种干预措施各一次)。会议将由利益相关者代表就每种干预措施特定的商定核心结局领域集提出建议。后续步骤将通过确定所有三种特定干预措施核心结局领域集中包含的共同结局领域,建立一个通用的跨领域核心结局领域集。为实现次要目标,我们将收集参与者关于他们参与德尔菲过程体验的反馈。我们希望进行一项观察性队列研究,以评估核心结局集发表7年后已发表研究中核心结局的采用情况。
COMIT'ID研究旨在开发一个核心结局领域集,该领域集被认为对于判定主观性耳鸣治疗是否有效至关重要。这样的建议将有助于使全球未来的临床试验标准化,因此我们将确定长期来看参与是否会增加核心结局集的使用。
该项目已于2014年11月在有效性试验核心结局测量(COMET)倡议数据库中注册。